UPDATED 10/16/18 Another favorite Black Radio is the RS-6 set.
(RS-6 = Radio Station number 6 per Central Intelligence Agency nomenclature.)
Some other sites go into the technical details of this set but I will mainly focus on general description, known history, my observations and actual operation in field environments for now. It is an historic although fun little camp radio and works equally well from tents, hide sites, cabins, palapas, safe houses or hotel rooms with a nearby tree for a clandestine antenna support.
Perfect for Secret Squirrel missions.
If you ask me a question that has a classified answer, I will reply
“I don’t know”.
If you ask me a question and I don’t know the answer, I will reply
Got it? ;0)
Below: Same rig, different place. Like the AN/GRC-109, this set has a Cool Factor 37 db higher than any plastic ricebox ever made by KenYaeIc. Today’s “appliance operators” will surely turn up their noses at this set. They would never Get It……
As a classic Black Radio, this long range HF morse code set was used by the CIA, partisans, Special Forces and Recon units. Anecdotal evidence has them being used in Southeast Asia, Europe and Central America; they were probably used “everywhere”. Oh, and they are quite EMP resistant.
They were designed for and procured by the CIA in 1949-1951 as a replacement for the WWII SSTR-1 sets among others. The first units started arriving in early 1952 when the successes and value of OSS operations in WWII were still in mind. Aside from direct-action clandestine service, they were also intended for extensive “stay behind” operations and War Reserve stocks.
However, by the mid 1960’s the actual deployment and usage rate was less than anticipated so a large surplus of RS-6 and RS-6A sets were eventually on hand. That included 3542 sets in CONUS locations plus an unknown number in OCONUS stocks, plus OCONUS cached or deployed sets. It is not unusual today to find otherwise pristine examples. Procurement costs were approximately $487 per set, “FOB Chicago”, (probably Motorola) costs probably depending upon contract date.
A CIA memo dated Sept 10, 1953 noted that in June 1952 the USAF had indicated an interest in the RS-6 and asked the CIA to procure 1500 sets for them. (Reference 60). This reference, et. al., indicates that the RS-6 was originally developed as a CIA set that was later adopted by the USAF rather than vice-versa as some have surmised.
The RS-6 and RS-6A were declared obsolete and excess to CIA inventory on May 10, 1967 and recommended for disposal by destruction. Destruction to prevent any from later “turning up” in locations “embarrassing to the Agency” since they were easily identifiable as CIA equipment. (Reference 59). How so many appeared in civilian hands later on is not known. Those probably came from US military units and/or allied nations’ excess stocks. How this CIA equipment appeared in US military (aside from the Strategic Air Command) or allied unit inventories is so far unknown.
The 1967 CIA Equipment Board Minutes (Reference 59) also noted that the USAF had “a number of years ago” discarded as obsolete the RS-6 sets that they had purchased.
A recent 2014 E Bay sale (WHAT ???!!!) revealed that a complete RS-6 set was found in the attic of a building in the town of Tarrenz in the Tirol region of western Austria. That communications cache included several one-time pads, a complete set of encryption/decryption materials written in German (the predominant language in Austria) and related items in addition to the complete RS-6 set. The cache included large NiCad batteries, antenna components, tools, an earplug, radio operating instructions and spare parts.
It was placed in Austria in 1961 apparently by an Austrian citizen, agent code named “GRBLAMED-31”, a member of a team code named “GRCROOND”. This was part of a US effort, via the CIA, to train, equip and support Austrian “Stay Behind” citizens in resisting a presumed Soviet invasion further into Western Europe. These teams were established in the early 1950’s to also provide communications for “E&E Lines” (escape and evasion routes) from eastern to western Austria and nearby countries. There were six known (FOIA reported) RS-6/RS-1 communications caches in Austria in 1961. (CIA FOIA declassified reports, Project GRCROOND, Reference 48). More to follow on that.
By the way, Soviet disinformation propaganda had a field day with sinister stories about the “real purpose” of these European stay-behind organizations once their presence became known to the general public.
Above: Contents of the equipment cache as found in Austria. Note the five RS-6 components wrapped in clear plastic, the printed crypto materials, a big NiCad battery, spare vacuum tubes for the transmitter and receiver, power supply vibrator, antenna wire/insulators and the cache/burial containers. Photo courtesy of Richard Brisson at www.campx.ca Many thanks to Richard for sharing his amazing acquisition.
As a matter of routine “Tradecraft” the radio equipment itself, the communications plan/crystals and the associated encrypt/decrypt materials would not all be cached in the same location. They would preferably be cached in 3 separate locations. This to thwart the enemy who finds a complete system and then uses it against you in an OPDEC (Operational Deception) effort. It is not known if the above photo shows the complete system as originally found, but the two containers indicate it may have been part of a larger cached system.
The CIA document (EUCA 61-966 Dispatch, Reference 48) that describes the inventory of this exact cache (by component serial numbers) also includes a complete RS-1 set (predecessor of the AN/GRC-109), GN-58 hand cranked generator and other materials which were apparently not included in this E Bay sale. This reference and related ones clearly show that radio operators working as Stay Behind agents in Austria were trained in both the RS-1 and RS-6 radio sets. From a mission perspective their training/operation is essentially identical for both sets.
We also know that the RS-6 was carried aboard B-36, B-47 and B-52 bombers from the early 1950’s to the mid 1960’s as a “come get us” survival/ rescue radio.
As mentioned above, the RS-6 was a direct replacement of the SSTR-1 set as used by the OSS in WWII. The development of sub miniature vacuum tubes enabled the technology leap to the much smaller RS-6 although the functionality and design similarities are obvious. Other direct blood relatives of the SSTR-1 are the RS-1 and GRC-109 sets.
The complete radio set is packaged in 4* small, light weight units to make concealed carry by one man possible, something not easily done with its predecessor, the RS-1 or the later GRC-109. The complete set of 4 units plus accessories weighs less than 16 pounds. The set operates from 70-270 Volts, 42-400 cps AC or 6 volts DC from the battery of that captured SCUD missile launcher. If AC power is available, it can also charge that captured vehicle battery. It could also be powered by a hand-cranked DC generator GN-58 with a suitable cable modification. The manual states that the GN-58 cable must be modified by replacing the radio-connector with a 6 contact female connector (which comes as an accessory to the RS-6) which then plugs into the RA-2 or RA-6 filter assembly. There may have been a stock cable for this purpose but the manual does not address that by part number. A suitable connector was supplied in the spares kit – but it was up to the operator to install it. Not good.
I have recently learned from the above cache that there was a power supply regulator unit, the RA-2, that was also* available at some point in time. (One can be seen in the above cache photo as the item wrapped in clear plastic with the white tape around it.) This allowed the transmitter and receiver to be directly powered by the GN-58 hand generator without needing the modified cable, the RP-6 AC power supply or the regulator/filter unit RA-6. This is the same function that the CN-690 provides for the RS-1 and GRC-109 sets. Wide voltage/frequency options and versatile power connectors made the RS-6 usable worldwide.
Interestingly, as in Austria, the Netherlands was also a user of the RS-6 for their own “Stay Behind” operations in case the neighborhood went down hill again. They made a couple of really good modifications: replacing the fragile interconnect connectors with more standard DB-9 connectors. Their choice of that connector indicates they used (use?) these radios well into the “computer age”. They also replaced the problematic vibrator circuit with a transistorized power supply built into the existing power conditioning unit when that technology became available. Very smart.
From the looks of it, they did not just replace the vibrator with a solid-state oscillator. It looks like a ground-up redesign for the space available. I’m sure that included replacement of the 6X4 rectifier tube with silicon. (Reference 23). The Australian 126 Signal Squadron was also equipped with the RS-6 and it is likely that many other allies have used them as well, the research continues.
I would imagine RS-6 and RS-1 sets were widely distributed and cached all over those countries on the periphery of the then Soviet Union. It is also known from CIA FOIA declassified releases that the RS-6, as standard equipment, was also used by anti-Communist expatriates in the early 1950’s operating back inside the USSR itself. (EGMA-5939 Dispatch, Reference 49) Brave, dedicated people. More on that later.
In the US, Project WASHTUB also planned for “Stay Behind” personnel in Alaska to provide intel on the presumed Soviet attack and occupation of Alaska during the early “cold war”. This FBI/US Air Force Office of Investigations program was operational from 1951 to 1959 when Alaska then became a state. Operatives would be locals with intimate knowledge of the terrain, conditions, people and survival skills needed to live in rural Alaska. Potential agents were approached; 89 were selected, trained and paid to perform as stay-behind citizens – and possession of an Amateur Radio license was a prime consideration. CW skills of Hams were a “given” in those days.
The source document describes notional communications with a submarine or with a fixed station in a secure area. The use of one-time-pads was mentioned. (Reference 35).
Would the RS-6 or RS-1 been an ideal (and readily available) radio set for this type of operating in 1950’s equipment caches in Alaska? I think so.
Shown below is an operating set at a favorite mountain location. The power supply is on the left, filter/voltage regulator in the center, transmitter on the right and the receiver on the bottom. A 12 volt garden tractor battery and 120 VAC sinewave inverter are located under the table.
My set is plenty worn by apparent heavy operational use, none of the serial numbers match; these are not “shelf queens”. If only they could talk……Actually, they can tell you their story if you pay very close attention. All of my units were built during 1952; the receiver (serial number of 3477) IF cans show a date code of week 48 in 1952.
The RS-6 radio covers 3 MC – 16.5 MC in 2 bands and my transmitter power output is about 8 watts (40 meters) to a simple 100′ wire antenna which is supplied. The RS-6A model covered 4.5 – 22 MC. The transmitter is crystal controlled, it is full break-in and the receiver can be crystal controlled or tuned continuously. The TX note is clean with no noticeable chirp with most crystals; it is a simple, solid design that works well. The receiver used the HS-301 earplug which I have not yet captured so I use a Trimm Featherweight headset instead. The complete set including headphones, cords, crystals and antenna fits in that ammo box.
An interesting variant of the RS-6 was the RS-511. It was a briefcase set that utilized the RT-6 transmitter, RR-6 receiver and a new power supply that included an AC line voltage meter, all being mounted to a single front panel inside a plain briefcase. Simplifies things.
The CIA found that (at least the early) RS-6 sets generated significant “key clicks” that could be heard in nearby Low Frequency European broadcast band receivers. This possibly betraying the nearby operation of a clandestine RS-6 set. These keying transients were generated in the transmitter keying and relay circuits along with other circuit/antenna interactions. Several modifications were discussed; I do not know which one(s) were eventually incorporated.
The RR-6 Receiver:
The receiver is a marvel of miniaturization using the technology available at the time; it is capable of both AM and CW reception. It uses eight “wired-in” pencil tubes (types 5899 and 5718 for all functions) making it very dense – somewhat hard to work on if necessary. It is a super-het with a 455 Kc IF and it incorporates an interesting two-band tuning mechanism/spiral frequency dial.
The entire 20 meter CW band from 14.0 to 14.1 Mc is covered by about a 60 degree rotation of the Fine Tuning control. That’s fast… The tuning mechanism has an understandably small amount of dial back lash caused mainly by a small rubber coupling “gear” linking the main tuning gear with the fine tuning wheel. However it is reasonably selective. So you need a steady hand, especially on the higher frequencies…(No mention of the IF band width specification in the manual). It also includes a 500 Kc crystal calibrator.
Above: The RR-6 Internal layout. The pencil tubes are under those copper clips/heat sinks/shields. The 3 IF transformers are across the bottom. This seems to be about the limit in miniaturization using the technology available at the time.
The design includes an RF stage and 2 stages of IF gain. Sensitivity wise, it can clearly hear a CW signal at and below the 1 microvolt level on the 80, 40, 30 and 20 meter bands and it is above the circuit noise. I did not measure the SNR during that check but it is usable nonetheless; not bad, all things considered.
Fun fact: While I was performing this test I happened to tune across a Spanish language numbers (encrypted) station transmitting via AM on 11,460 Kc at around 0530 Zulu. I recorded it and will post it here once I review and download the file. There were many 5 number cipher groups, but then the station switched to numerical addressees callup followed by 24 second digital data streams sent to each apparent addressee. It shut down transmission at 0550 and turned off the carrier at 0605 Zulu. Someone has gone Hi Tech with these the digital transmissions – no CW cut-numbers groups sent using a One Time Pad….If they only knew that their agent communications was being intercepted by a 1950’s “Spy” radio – the RS-6. HaHa. It could still easily do the job. More to follow.
Here’s a similar coded transmission that I recorded, this time in “cut numbers” Morse Code. Most likely station “M8A” in Cuba. 5800 kc late one night: Click the “Arrow” button.
(Che Guevara isn’t listening anymore, but they do keep trying.)
(Yes, I did hear him on my old S-120 receiver while I was in high school in the 1960’s…)
I’m not sure if my receiver is representative of the performance routinely obtainable, but I feel it is the weak link in the system, at least for “Ham” radio use. You have to be pretty careful in setting the “Volume” control (actually an RF/IF stage gain control – there is no provision for AGC/AVC) and also the BFO tuning, probably indicative of limited dynamic range. As with the GRC-109 receiver, a useful “after market” amplified speaker helps considerably in setting the receiver gain for optimum performance – and then adjusting the speaker volume so you can hear it.
The receiver is plenty adequate for ham operation under uncrowded band conditions on 80, 40 or 30 meters and will make contacts on 20 but the tuning rate is a really fast up there. I’ve made many contacts out to 200 miles during the day and over 1000 miles on 80/40 at night. The receiver is very sensitive and sounds good on AM with its broad IF passband, but the tuning rate is fast by modern “ham” standards. You wouldn’t try to make THAT comparison, would you?
The receiver just feels “touchy” primarily due to the fast tuning rate – but maybe that is part of the Charm of the set. It does the job as intended but it is no contest receiver – crowded band conditions are not its forte…But it is small, lightweight and concealable – and that drove many design compromises….The more I use it, the more I appreciate what it can do. It’s called Character, something no Ricebox will ever have….
The RT-6 Transmitter:
The transmitter is a 2-tube MOPA design using a 6AG5 crystal oscillator and a 2E26 PA tube. It includes a built-in, swing out CW key which is a bit exposed and fragile but it can also be keyed by an external J-45 knee key (which I prefer) as seen above, or bug. I would consider the built-in key to be an emergency key rather than one to be used for routine transmissions.
The transmitter includes a simple sidetone function since the receiver is powered off while transmitting. It is designed with a neon lamp relaxation oscillator that is connected directly to the headphones with an external jumper (see Mods below). Simple, effective, odd; I like it!
The transmitter can also be keyed by an external high-speed keyer. CIA FOIA documents mention “MK”, “AS-1” and a “PAMM” (Portable Automatic Morse Machine) as keyers. I think the RS-6 pre-dates the GRA-71 code burst keyer so I am looking for further information on keying equipment and usage. The interface connectors are certainly incompatible. The manual says the transmitter high speed keying jack can follow 60 WPM keying – so that keying source is a mystery.
The “PAMM” keyer sounds like it was a device to permit keying the RT-6 transmitter (at 10-60 WPM) via a paper tape previously prepared by an operator who was not trained in morse code. The CIA was finding it difficult and time consuming to train agents in morse along with other necessary field craft.
The GRA-71 operates at 300 WPM. The manual also mentions the possibility of plugging a “Frequency Shift Unit” into the crystal jack. I wonder what that would be used for…Maybe an embassy or clandestine outpost running an encrypted RATT setup at 60 WPM?
The radio is not even remotely water resistant and the interconnects are fragile so it would be marginally useful in the jungle (read: NOT useful). A GRC-109 would be much better choice, albeit much heavier as well. The US Army Special Forces used the GRC-109’s to tie together all the SF “A” Team camps throughout Vietnam on a common CW net and they also used them while on the move. In a jungle “vill” the GRC-109 would have been pretty ideal versus the RS-6 – rugged, forgiving, effective. But that set wouldn’t fit in a briefcase either. For more information on the AN/GRC-109, take a look here:AN/GRC-109 Set
The Vietnamese Montagnard “Mountain Scouts” were equipped and trained in the use of the RS-6 radios in 1961. Providing regional communications support proved problematic; the 25 Montagnard villagers trained as radio operators had difficulty mastering the idiosyncrasies of these particular radios once they returned to their home districts. Not too surprising. They often had to rely upon other means of communications. Reference 26. There is clear evidence they were widely used by the CIA in particular in the 1950’s – 1960’s in southeast Asia, Europe and notably inside the USSR. References 27, 49 et. al.
I think the RS-6 was clearly not designed for tactical military field use but rather as a “brief case” or “Black Base” type radio for the CIA, partisans or similar organizations / missions. (A “spy radio” if you will. It’s such an imprecise term.) Its complete lack of environmental protection is a good indicator. Also there does not seem to be a standard U.S. military Technical Manual (TM) for this set as there would be for a Standard A issue set. The RS-6 “Instruction Book” looks very primitive: just sheets stapled together, no document number, date, publisher or author is included (there is a manual addendum dated 1953 however).
That said, the technical detail in the Instruction Book is pretty good. Also, I have not found any reference to the RS-6 in any U.S. TM’s or in any Field Manuals as it would be, had it been used by the conventional military. It clearly was (see Jess’s comment below as an example), but that use seems to be limited. However that assessment is based upon limited documentation or history available for this set. See Peter McCollums notes on the RS-6 radios on W5OR’s excellent site www.militaryradio.com for more details, especially production analysis and insights into possible deployment. He estimates about 10,000 were built. That’s a lot of radios, especially for this type of set.
Above is the complete station ready for extended field Ops at a remote campsite, here driving a coax-fed dipole. Pretty much everything you would need including the PU-181 300 Watt AC generator which is well in excess of the power needs of this little radio. (A standard UGP-12 400 cps AC generator would be more appropriate here.)
For routine use, I prefer the use of the J-45 “knee key” to the installed, swing-out key in the RT-6 transmitter – it is a bit exposed and fragile in the field but certainly lighter and less complex.
The external key, when used, needs to be plugged into the “High Speed Key Jack” only half way unless you modify the key circuit wiring. This was a “burst keyer” accommodation. If you plug an external key all the way in, it shorts out the TR relay into the Transmit position, disabling QSK operation – not what you want during manual keying. An easy mistake for the untrained to make. You ARE trained, aren’t you?
The RT-6 Transmitter Schematic
Above: The transmitter schematic. Noting fancy or novel. It would feel right at home in a 1940-50’s Ham Radio magazine or handbook except those would probably have had a link-coupled balanced output or possibly a Pi Network output circuit as the GRC-109 does.
The RS-6 provides reliable comms from zero out to about 500 -1000 miles, more at night, depending of course upon propagation conditions.
By way of comparison, the transmitters in the GRC-109, RS-1 and RS-6 sets use the same PA tube, a 2E26 and all three put out about 10 watts. I have used my GRC-109 to work most US states, from Alaska and Hawaii to Massachusetts and Florida (from California) just using a simple dipole antenna on 7 Mc. I have also worked Aruba and France with the 10 watt GRC-109 from here. These simple 10 watt transmitters and can provide long ranges.
If you are working by yourself, or if you need to monitor a frequency for extended periods, the AC generator sure beats cranking the GN-58 for hours. The system makes no provision for powering the receiver from a local HV dry battery (unlike the GRC-109) beyond the 6 VDC / lead acid battery setup – if you have a 6 volt car battery and are willing to put up with the vibrator hash. But then again, that is tactically quiet when operating under sound discipline conditions.
The RS-6 set was issued as optional mission equipment in a canvas bag for stowage in the bomb bays of the B/RB-47 and B/RB-52 bombers in the 1950’s and 1960’s, depending upon their Op Area. It is referenced in a 1959 8th Air Force document (Emergency Rescue Manual 64-1) listing various survival equipment to be carried at the Commanders option.
See http://k4che.com/RS-6/SAC%20Manual.html an excellent reference site on the availability of the RS-6 aboard those USAF aircraft. The idea that after hitting targets “over the pole”, they might not carry enough fuel to make it all the way home.
Crash land on the ice or tundra at your pre-designated site, break out the RS-6 and call for a pickup. Battle damaged aircraft might have to try to crash land or have the crew bail out over a pre-designated land location suitable for “E&E” movement or pickup as well. Such a site would be remote, with no roads nearby, but suitable for landing by a C-47 or similar rescue aircraft. Long and short range communications would be essential, of course. A URC-4 would have been the local ground-air set in those days.
K4CHE’s website photo also shows a Soviet propaganda photo of Francis Powers’ equipment after his U-2 was shot down on a photo recon mission over the Soviet Union in 1960. Clearly shown is a URC-4 radio with its battery pack; the radio mounted on a tripod with its dual-band ground plane antenna system. The URC-4 was used as a special “Here I am” beacon for rescue operations. Also visible is what clearly looks like RS-6 radio components.
Incidentally, below is the last B-47 to ever fly. It was sitting in the desert at China Lake CA weapons test range for use as a photography and radar training target, slowly rotting away. It was then towed 23 miles to a rework area and restored to a point where it could make one last trip in 1986 from China Lake to Castle AFB also in California. Piloted by Major General JD Moore. Cool.
The RS-6 set was also carried aboard Strategic Air Command B-36 bombers along with several URC-4 rescue radios. See Reference 25.
One persistent rumor is that RS-6’s were somehow installed in the ejection seat(s) of the B-47 (and by extrapolation to B-52’s as well) for this purpose. I have not found any reference to that specific installation but I believe it’s a fairy tale propagated by “circular research” on the Internet. Why?
The field-usable set includes the 23 pound GN-58 hand cranked generator and its legs assembly parts: together they are BIG, HEAVY and CLUMSY. Additional weight, volume and complexity is something you don’t want in a cramped ejection seat.
AC power or 6 volt vehicle batteries would be unobtanium on the ice or tundra. So the hand cranked generator was necessary. So once the (CW-qualified) crewman ejected, he would quickly become detached from the seat before his chute opened, dooming the ejection seat, generator, generator seat and radio to a free fall to the ice below.
If it somehow survived that, you would then have to go find the fragments at the bottom of an ice crater a mile away from where you landed. Unlikely, in my opinion. Would have never passed a design review. Or even a simple Sanity Check. I doubt it would have worked as an attachment to the pilots ejection seat parachute harness either, like a raft or other survival gear pack would – way too heavy and clumsy. Anyone got actual hard evidence on the “ejection seat” story? Proving a negative is difficult; but extensive research has yielded no factual information on the ejection seat “story”.
So only certain ejection seats included this 23 pound cannon ball? No. Jumping out of a bomber or an agent-delivery aircraft with one attached to your parachute harness, why not? (with this modification)
There are a small number of these “shorty” leg sets for the GN-58(*) hand cranked generator in the hands of collectors. They appear to be locally made by the military from parts from the larger LG-2A/3 seat-type mount. The shorty set would also be easier to conceal for an agent moving or working covertly.
Above: The RS-6 set alongside a GN-58A generator illustrating my “shorty” leg set. Much smaller and more compact than the large tripod seat assembly with the LG-2-A seat strut. (Note in the above photo that the CD-1086 cord radio-end connector needs to be replaced with the smaller type to mate with the RA-2 or RA-6 filter accessory. As noted above, that small connector was provided with the set for a DIY “field modification”)
This arrangement would fit inside the canvas bag known to be carried in SAC bombers for the RS-6 set at the time. That bag includes standard parachute clips that would permit attachment to a parachute harness “D” rings, probably the same ones that the reserve chute attached to.
That bag could presumably fit the entire set, including the heavy but necessary GN-58 with the “shorty” legs. The bag also included a 20 foot canvas strap with clips at either end that would allow the jumper to detach the kit from the harness during descent and lower it beneath him for a safer landing configuration. Parachutist SOP. Photo courtesy of Cryptomuseum.com.
Check out their great website on the RS-6 and similar gear. http://cryptomuseum.com/spy/rs6/index.htm
In the short leg configuration it would probably take 2 men just to operate the GN-58 – one to crank and the other to put a heavy boot on the generator to hold it down while cranking. Inefficient but workable.
Above: A comparison of the “shorty” and standard LG-2-A seat strut. My working theory is that the shorty struts were locally made from the larger seat and leg assembly. (Possibly modified by SAC but possibly by others; either CIA agent parachutists or those who were otherwise encumbered by carrying the larger seat and legs.) Note the extra hole in the shorty strut – formerly used to attach the seat brace. Pretty good evidence.
Above: Note the hacksaw marks where the original rivets were sawed off and then replaced with common machine screws. Also note that the original LG-2-A was made of steel, the shorty strut is aluminum in this set.
The shorty set also includes a pair of modified LG-3 legs for the rear of the generator. Mine are steel and very likely made from the longer legs of another set. The foot-end of these were cut down.
A friend advised me that if I needed to depend upon it working, I should “bring along a bandolier of 6X4 rectifier tubes”. He sure was right – after a few hours of field operation, the 6X4 failed, its replacement from my spares kit also failed shortly thereafter. Turns out the tube is screaming in poorly-ventilated pain; operating above its maximum ratings for both input voltage and output current. Obvious design weakness with predicable results, just give it some time.
This was before HV silicon diodes were available and space was a premium, but come on – this was not workable. It would never have passed an engineering design review. Bad things happen when program deliverable pressures approach. I replaced the 6X4 with two 1N4007 silicon diodes and dropping resistors and it now works great. (See Appendix below for details.) One can operate the set with the power supply voltage selector switch set to the next-higher input voltage (at the expense of performance) to keep from killing the 6X4. No mention of that work-around in the manual. What Operator would think to do that anyway? Anyone else actually used the RS-6 operationally and experience any different outcome?
Also, the filter/regulator unit runs very hot – painful to touch due to the large voltage drop across the regulator tubes’ voltage dropping resistors and the VR tubes themselves. They regulate from +400 VDC down to 85-90 VDC for the lower voltage stages. That heat does no good to the oil filled filter caps either. This radio would not sit on the ice for long, you would need a lanyard to retrieve it from the melt hole. Perhaps that bandolier would come in handy.
The transmit-receive relay is also somewhat fragile as well. Pulled in by the 2E26 cathode idling current (on receive) , it could have used a few more coil turns. In my transmitter, the pull-in force is pretty marginal and a reasonable bump will cause the contacts to let go. This was a design tradeoff regarding cathode voltage, cathode current, keying speed, contact sparking and COTS relay availability. When it works, it works OK, actually pretty well, providing acceptable full break-in using a common antenna, something the GRC-109 is not good at with a common antenna.
The simple TX output network is interesting. The 2E26 drives a parallel resonant tuned tank circuit, via a blocking capacitor, to ground. The tank inductor is tapped by the antenna impedance matching switch; closer to ground for low impedance antennas, higher up towards the plate for high Z antennas. Antenna RF goes through a series lamp as a tuning indicator, works great but carry spares. The manual states it will drive antennas of between 75 and 1200 ohms, depending upon the matching switch setting.
The Instruction Book advises to configure the “Hank” antenna wire as a quarter wave inverted L; up as high as possible. The length equation is provided. This would be a low impedance antenna but the set will also drive a high impedance antenna such as an end fed half wave configuration. In that case the output indicator lamp will barely glow when tuning since the output current is correspondingly low.
On the other hand the separate “Description and Operating Instructions” pamphlet advises that the optimum antenna is a 3/4 wavelength wire although a wire as short as 1/4 wavelength is acceptable depending upon circumstances. Both of course recommending a “good ground”.
The PA output network seems to work very well but the harmonic suppression of this circuit would be very poor – not a consideration for its intended use. Simple and effective. (however, a CIA engineering document discusses a possible need for a “low pass filter” for the transmitter output.) I have found the RT-6 loads resonant dipoles, 100 foot and shorter wires (“against” simple radial ground wires), “grounded” barbed wire fences and the rain gutters on the home QTH for stealth operations. Keep it clean on the Ham Bands – use a low-pass filter on the output end.
I run mine in the bush via either a PU-181 gas generator or via a 120 VAC sine wave inverter powered by a small 12 Volt “garden tractor” battery. Cheap square wave inverters generate too much switching hash for the receiver to deal with. The internal 6 volt vibrator supply works but it also generates a lot of switching hash in my set making it marginally useful, overwhelming the receiver. Wonder how that was dealt with operationally…or was that feature reliably ever used. Maybe it’s just my set, the CIA documents do not mention vibrator hash problems.
The inclusion of a wet cell NiCad battery in the Austrian cache indicates its viability.
Out in the Bush:
Above: Running the RS-6 set (on the stump) with a J-38 on CW in camp in the fall. The SCR-284 is listening to the West Coast Military Radio Collectors Net on 3985 Kc. Here using an external J-38 key on the RS-6. I think I was trying to “Break” the AM phone net on CW at the time. Good operators on that net – they listen for weak field sets and CW stations between the T-368’s and SRT-14’s. Try THAT on an another AM net with guys running broadcast transmitters! At a minimum, you’ll run out of kerosene While-U-Wait for a pause…..
Below is the same RS-6 set operational at my campsite. The small 12 volt “garden tractor” battery is seen under the table; the blue sine-wave inverter is nearby to power the station. It will run the radio for several days of operation. The entire station except the battery and inverter fits inside the large-size ammo box on the table, making for a small, compact storage and transport package. I usually run a coax-fed 80/40 dipole pair for an antenna but sometimes just a random wire in the trees if I am in a hurry. In that case I just throw a long piece of bare wire in the river, weighted down by a rock for a “ground”. In a radio-quiet location such as this, this little radio can hear everything and gets out well.
I tend to like to camp near water which naturally is found in “low spots” (Duh), not generally good for radio. However using NVIS “techniques” (duh) and careful antenna placement, I can get regional comms out to 500 miles easily with this simple setup even in a river canyon with thousand foot mountains on either side. This particular transmitter puts out 8.2 watts to a 50 ohm load on 40 meters which is plenty of power for reliable regional comms. It helps if you have a skilled QRP-CW operator on the other end. I’ve even got a few places with “permanent” antennas installed in the trees that I can just hook up to upon arrival. Stealthy construction and placement in a remote spot can come in handy.
Under good propagation conditions the RS-6 can get you several thousand miles on the right frequency at the right time of day with the right antenna. Cross-continent range is not difficult on the 14 MC CW band. If you are working over an unfamiliar path or with different TX and RX equipment or antennas, you can download and use the VOACAP program to help you get in the ballpark in finding the optimum frequency for that path. Select TX and RX sites, TX power, transmission mode, R and T antennas and run the calculation. The graph will then indicate the optimum transmission times for that situation. Mission planning – It’s pretty good. Provides a graph of circuit probability versus frequency versus UTC time of day.
If you are in routine contact with your buddy over a fixed path and your station and his are a fixed design, you will quickly learn the best freqs and times for reliable comms. No prediction software necessary. If it’s in the “NVIS” parameter set, lower freqs at night, higher during the day, stay about 10 percent below the Critical Frequency fo. If you are a Ham, that’s usually 80 or 60 meters at night, 40 or 30 meters during the day. More or less. It works. More than 1000 miles, go higher and plan skeds for when the sun is between you and your target. More or less.
I modified the AC power Jones plug to bring out chassis ground to a 3 pin wall plug as a safety precaution and to assist in RF grounding the radio when using random wire antennas. Careful – those exposed male Jones pins are HOT with AC before you connect it to the power supply!
Below is another station being set up at yet another campsite, the antennas yet to be rigged. (Vintage Field Day 2006) A good size comparison between the RS-6 and GRC-109 stations. The GRC-109 system with all the accessories and antenna fits in the green transit case under the canteen; the RS-6 fits in the smaller ammo box. (The big green transit case was not designed for the GRC-109 but I use it for that purpose).
Above: Sending out the morning SITREP from another remote campsite in the Sierras. One shortcoming the RS-6 has relative to the GRC-109 is its complete lack of weatherization as stated earlier. All 4 units have ventilation or other large holes in their cases which prevents them from being used in a wet/rainy environment outside. It’s imperative to keep it off the ground and best under some kind of cover if there is any chance of rain. A rain fly and simple table did the trick on this Op. If it’s Sun, it’s Fun – If it’s Raining, it’s Training…..
A recent trip to the mountains; August 2013: Forward Operating Base (FOB) Long Rock
Above: On yet another camping trip to the Sierra Nevada mountains. Here we are getting set up under a poncho hootch with the RS-6. Running a 40 meter dipole up about 40 feet on 7050 KC, primarily. I had a little problem with the set on this trip. There was intermittent arcing someplace on Transmit and that caused lots of receiver noise after switching back to receive at times. There is a component probably in the 450 volt transmitter B+ circuit that is breaking down at this 7500 foot elevation site. Lower air pressure produced lower dielectric strength of air as an insulator. (About a 20 % reduction from sea-level to 7500 feet). That could facilitate arcing…It worked fine at lower elevations, gotta investigate. Possibly dust between the variable capacitor plates aggravating the situation..
Above: The basic setup. Small square of plywood keeps things off the ground. Everything here (except the J-45 Key) fits in the ammo can for transport, storage or caching. This particular set has a lot of miles on it; both mine and from its original operators.
Above: The RS-6 contains a handy set of double-sided, laminated schematic and system setup cards. They store under the spring in the lid of the power supply filter-regulator unit. Very handy for an otherwise inexperienced operator (bring your glasses…). I also included a copy of the TX schematic with some minor modifications I had made. The yellowing paper under the spring is a hand-written note from another RS-6 operator from long ago and far away…..Also seen here is the micro switch I installed in this unit to enable a transmitter “spot” function to get the receiver on-frequency.
Above: My trusty PU-181 generator powering the RS-6 set. Mosquitoes beware! TM11-943 states that it will run for 7.5 hours at the full 300 watts output on one tank of fuel. When powering even my higher powered military radio gear in the boonies running casual camping operations it will go for over a week on a single tank. Fill it up and go….no need to bring the Jerry can.
For more information about the antenna kit I use with this and other field radios, take a look here: Portable Field Antenna Kit
Above: Everything needed fits into a standard .50 caliber ammo can. Or:
Above: If you need to store or cache the entire set, along with a GN-58 hand cranked generator, this is another option. The ubiquitous 20 mm ammo can can hold the entire set, again with the “shorty” generator leg set. Lots of room for additional gear in this completely waterproof package. Indefinite storage if needed. Can you dig it!
Once its design compromises are worked-around, accepted or corrected (apologies to the restoration purists – I feel your pain) it’s a pretty good little field radio. It does the job and is fun to use. All 4 main units, ac power cord, headphones, antenna wire, crystals, instruction cards, spare parts, power adapters, pencil, logbook, one-time pads (ahem) and silica gel bags all fit nicely into a standard “large” ammo can for watertight storage, transport or caching. As mentioned earlier, it also has a cool factor 37 db higher than any plastic ricebox ever made by KenYaeIc….
The Cool Factor of the RS-6 goes a long way towards the fun in using this set in the field. If I had to choose between the RS-6 and the GRC-109 – I’d go with the GRC-109 mainly because of its relative ease in setup and “field hardening”. The RS-6 system is “connections intensive” and uses somewhat fragile power connectors relative to the GRC-109. Also, the RR-6 receiver feels less substantial than the GRC-109’s R-1004, both electrically and especially mechanically. The RT-6 transmitter is pretty solid, works well and is simple but the compromises made in designing the receiver to also be very small makes tuning a bit “fussy”. It works OK but I prefer the ‘109 receiver for casual operating, especially in the boonies. If I had to carry them any distance – it would be the RS-6 for sure. These two sets were employed for different purposes (although there is a lot of overlap in capabilities) so a direct comparison is somewhat unfair. YMMV!
APPENDIX: RS-6 Modification Details
First off, I really don’t like to modify any of these old mil radios – I like to use them as-is as part of the overall “experience”. But this one needed help and is of course reversible if needed; no new holes. Seems a lot of people who have these just fire them up once or twice and then put them away. I use mine a lot and these mods make it much more useful but probably not necessary for occasional “demo” use…
The main issue is the 6X4 rectifier tube operating beyond its limits. A real mystery here, that tube was a bad choice but there are many compromises in this type of equipment to make it small etc.
I replaced the 6X4 with 2 silicon diodes. Each side consists of a 1N4007 diode in series with a 10 ohm, 1 watt resistor. That assembly just plugs into the 6X4 tube socket.
One diode anode goes into pin 1, its cathode-end resistor goes into pin 7. The other side of the 6X4 replacement diode assembly similarly goes into pin 6 (anode end) and its cathode-end resistor also goes to pin 7, thus making a 2-diode, full wave rectifier. The resistors limit the zero-crossing surge current, protecting the diodes and also reduce the output voltage a bit to simulate the drops in the original 6X4. A bit of heat-shrink tubing over each assembly holds them in place. Heat is also an issue in the RP6 power supply box and this mod helps a bit.
I also had to replace the T-R relay eventually. If you have a “hot” 2E26 transmitter tube that draws healthy cathode current, you might be OK with leaving the original relay in place. If it’s not working, you’ll know. Mine barely held the contacts together and it became annoying so I replaced it with a relay that I had, that fit the small space. (12 volt DPDT* Aromet S2EB, P/N AG30236098.) Works great. [*corrected text]
I thought the neon lamp relaxation oscillator generating the CW sidetone was too high pitched – sounded like a mosquito and there are already enough of them around. To lower the tone, I bridged C-114 with a .0047 uF ceramic disc capacitor. Adjust to your liking. More better.
I modified the built-in key system by bending the “stowed contact” switch tab out of the way so the transmitter would NOT be keyed when the key was folded inside. This mod enables successful keying with an external key while the internal key is “stowed” and protected. This disables the burst keying potential but that’s OK; easily returned to normal if needed. Just bend the tab back into position.
I also replaced R110, the 12 ohm “antenna lamp shunt” in the transmitter circuit with a 10 ohm, 2 watt resistor. The original 12 ohm resistor was causing the #49 lamp to fail too often. Too much RF current thru the lamp with low impedance antennas like dipoles. #49’s are hard to find…
A safety mod is to provide for a 3-wire AC power cord since I operate in the bush a lot and was concerned about standing in the mud with 120 VAC floating around from the generator. Remember those power plug pins are males, and HOT when plugged into the AC source… Simple grounding mod: Replace the unpolarized 2-wire AC line cord that’s wired into PL1 with a standard 3-wire cord. The AC Hot goes to pin 4 and Neutral goes to pin 7. Connect pins 1 and 8 together in the PL1 male line plug, then connect them to the green grounding wire in the new 3-wire line cord keeping the chassis grounded via the polarized plug ground pin. Now the chassis is at AC earth ground. This also helps “RF ground” the radio when using random wire antennas without another ground or ground wire array. Remember to connect the male PL1 to the power supply BEFORE plugging the cord into the AC power outlet!
Another good mod is to add a spotting switch so you can hear the TX in the receiver to know where you are. In the Filter – Regulator module, add a momentary SPST microswitch connected to pins 5 & 6 of TR switch S301 and mount it inside the accessory compartment. When pushed, the PS now powers the RX for spotting purposes when the SEND-RECEIVE switch is in the TRANS position and the key is depressed. Takes 3 hands, but very handy.