<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>N6CC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.n6cc.com/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.n6cc.com</link>
	<description>NAVY 6 COMBAT COMMS</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 19:43:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Military Vehicle Collectors Rally April 2012</title>
		<link>http://www.n6cc.com/military-vehicles-rally-april-2012</link>
		<comments>http://www.n6cc.com/military-vehicles-rally-april-2012#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2012 22:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Radio News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n6cc.com/?p=4004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE: The MVCC Camp Delta and Battalion Communications Center for 2012 are now history. For some photos of the 2012 event setup, go to the Radio News category, MVCC Battalion [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>UPDATE:  The MVCC Camp Delta and Battalion Communications Center for 2012 are now history. For some photos of the 2012 event setup, go to the Radio News category, MVCC Battalion Comm Center.  Good fun &#8211; more to follow&#8230;</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 629px"><img class="    " src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/P4181213.jpg" alt="" width="619" height="464" /><p class="wp-caption-text">MVCC Battalion Comm Center  Apr 2012  N6CC</p></div>
<p>The Military Vehicle Collectors of California held their annual Camp Delta Rally and campout the week of 15-22 April 2012.  This is the largest military vehicle gathering in the West and is held at Camp Delta at Tower Park near Lodi CA.  The site is the KOA campground off Highway 12, five miles west of the intersection with I-5.  There are usually over 200 military vehicles of all types in attendance, many with the correct vintage radio equipment installed.  Included were militaria displays, living history demonstrations, Civil War units, a large flea market, classic movies and good chow.  As with past MVCC rally&#8217;s, the West Coast Military Radio Collectors Group set up, operate and display a range of vintage military radio communications equipment.  In addition to the usual live operation of our station equipment, we had a PRD-1 HF radio direction finder up and running.  Photos of past operations can be viewed in the Radio News category of this Blog.</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 870px"><img class="  " src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/P4181228.jpg" alt="" width="860" height="645" /><p class="wp-caption-text">PRD-1 radio Direction Finder Batt Comm Cen N6CC</p></div>
<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/P4191296.jpg" alt="" width="860" height="645" /><br />
A variety of military vehicles were found in every direction.</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 650px"><img class="  " src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/P4200271.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="480" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Battalion Comm Center: Part of HF and VHF Commo Positions - N6CC</p></div>
<p>The FRAG Order with details of the equipment, frequencies and operations planned for April 2012 is below:</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 859px"><img src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/FRAGO-REV-A.jpg" alt="" width="849" height="1089" /><p class="wp-caption-text">FRAGO REVA</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 859px"><img src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/FRAGO-REVA2.jpg" alt="" width="849" height="1090" /><p class="wp-caption-text">FRAGO REV A2</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 870px"><img class="  " src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/P4191270.jpg" alt="" width="860" height="645" /><p class="wp-caption-text">NO Parking.  Seriously.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.n6cc.com/military-vehicles-rally-april-2012/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fast Patrol Torpedo Boats / PTF-17</title>
		<link>http://www.n6cc.com/trumpy_ptf17</link>
		<comments>http://www.n6cc.com/trumpy_ptf17#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 00:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fast Patrol Torpedo Boats - PTF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n6cc.com/?p=1524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PTF-17, PTF’s in general and Coastal River Division 21 Ops: First, a little background: During most of their service in Vietnam the PTF’s operated as the primary naval weapons of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<div>
<p><strong>PTF-17, PTF’s in general and Coastal River Division 21 Ops: </strong></p>
<p><strong>First, a little background</strong>:  During most of their  service in Vietnam the PTF’s operated as the  primary naval weapons of  OPLAN 34A.  The boats were actually leased to the Republic of Vietnam,  crewed by Vietnamese sailors,  trained by US Navy advisors and support  personnel back at Da Nang.  They were highly effective in their mission  objectives, taking the fight back north to the communists of the  “Democratic” Republic of Vietnam.  Whether stopping seaborne  infiltration of weapons, inserting  commando teams, supporting agents,  conducting raids, capturing NVA  personnel,  or engaging in psyops, the  PTF’s were uniquely suited to those  missions.   Fast, long range and  heavily armed, they out-fought the Soviet and ChiCom &#8211; supplied P-4, P-6 and Swatow gun boats that tried to stop them. See References (7), (8) and (18) primarily.  <em>Photo Below: Curt Froyen</em></p>
<p><img src="../wp-content/uploads/WakeCrossWTRM.pdf-pages.jpg" alt="" width="593" height="424" /></p>
<p><em>To put some of this document into context, I was a Plank Owner in Coastal River Division 21, having joined in the winter of 1972-1973 while the boats were still in post-Vietnam overhaul at Lemont, Illinois.  As a &#8220;Boot Ensign&#8221; I was initially assigned to CRD-21 Staff as Weapons  Officer and Electronic Materiel Officer.  I subsequently also served as XO of PTF-18 and then &#8220;fleeted-up&#8221; as Officer in Charge of PTF-17, a  distinct honor, challenge and responsibility for a young Ensign. The crew kept me out of trouble &#8211; in the finest Navy tradition. </em></p>
<p><em><img class="alignnone" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/Plank-Owner.jpg" alt="" width="475" height="316" /><br />
</em></p>
<p><em>Having enlisted in the Navy in 1971, I graduated from boot camp at Great Lakes, completed Class &#8220;A&#8221; School (Communications Technician &#8211; Radio and Technical Branches), OCS and then to the Naval Training Center, back at Great Lakes.  After completing my active duty time with CRD-21 in 8/75, I served on CRD-21 staff as a drilling reservist for an additional year in the billet of Assistant Ops Officer while maintaining my former collateral duties as Weapons Officer and Electronic Materiel Officer.</em></p>
<p><strong>The PTF</strong>:  The first 80 foot, wood-hulled Nasty Class  PTF boats were built in Norway, based upon their Tjeld Class   Motor  Torpedo Boats.  The Norwegians learned from WWII PT boat   experiences  and built upon them – unfortunately we did not.  We gave up on this type of  vessel   after WWII when most surviving Pacific boats were burned on  the beach at Samar in the Philippines.  They Were Expendable….The next  time it would be a “push button war”.    Then came Vietnam&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 890px"><img src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/cropped-PTF17-Wtrmrk1.jpg" alt="" width="880" height="280" /><p class="wp-caption-text">PTF-17 Underway  N6CC</p></div>
<p>With no enemy targets worthy of (or approved for) a torpedo, the US  Navy outfitted them as heavily armed gunboats, not unlike the WWII PT  boats used to take THAT fight back to Japan, especially in the Solomons and New  Guinea campaigns.  However the hybrid type-name “Fast Patrol Torpedo  Boat”, “PTF” surfaced.   So we bought 14 of them from Norway (PTF’s  3-16), known as the Nasty Class.  We   then built another 6  PTF’s (PTF-17, 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22)  as virtual copies under license to fulfill our   needs in Vietnam.  Those 6 were built by  John Trumpy and Sons in Annapolis MD in 1968 and   are sometimes called  “Trumpy’s” or sometimes “PTF-17 Class&#8221; or sometimes even &#8220;Nasty&#8217;s&#8221;, depending upon the  document.</p>
<p><strong>CRD 21&#8242;s Boats</strong>:  The boats of Coastal River Division 21, PTF&#8217;s 17, 18 and 19 operated in Vietnam for several years.  There are several photos elsewhere on the web of Da Nang harbor and the PTF base piers during the late 1960&#8242;s &#8211; early 1970&#8242;s.  The boats pictured are clearly Trumpy&#8217;s as indicated by the distinctive rectangular slot radar antennas.  (PTF&#8217;s 3-16 had a prominent curved radar antenna described elsewhere on this website).  The Da Nang photos show boats that could have been any of PTF&#8217;s 17-22 but the photo&#8217;s don&#8217;t show the specific hull numbers stenciled on the bridge.  Those were painted black and hard to see in any event.  There are also numerous photos of PTF&#8217;s being repaired and overhauled back at Subic.  Again, many Trumpy&#8217;s but no obvious individual hull numbers are visible.  The declassified record is pretty thin when it comes to combat ops of individual boats by hull number.  Hopefully more will be revealed over time.</p>
<p>Below is a shot of PTF-18 up on step.</p>
<p><em>Photo Below:  Tim Sammons</em></p>
<p><img title="PTF On Step" src="../wp-content/uploads/BW-PTF_NEW.jpg" alt="" width="833" height="432" /></p>
<p><strong>PTF’s 23-26</strong> were different boats entirely – the “Osprey” class built by Sewart Seacraft in Berwick, Louisianain 1968.  They were 95 foot aluminum hulled boats but with  the same Napier Deltic engines and similar weapons systems.   They were reportedly too big and heavy to really get up “on step” and cruised more  as a &#8220;semi-displacement&#8221; type hull would.  They were therefore somewhat slower  – by 5 knots  according to JANES Fighting Ships, Reference (9), than the  planning-hull Nasty’s.  There are some references stating they were  originally built to be powered by a gas turbine engine – hence the large  air intake structure behind the pilot house.  That would have been a  great system for a boat that size although at the expense of fuel  economy.  With all that aluminum they also had a much bigger radar  return too, not good for stealthy Ops or when up against  radar-controlled guns.  Reference (7) states all 4 Osprey’s were in Da  Nang in 1968.  They were apparently withdrawn back to the US within 6  months because their aluminum hulls developed severe fatigue cracks from  the pounding.  Can any of you Osprey guys expound upon any of this?</p>
<p><strong>Let&#8217;s Begin</strong>:  This article will describe life aboard PTF-17 and Coastal River  Division 21.  I’ll note the very minor differences between the Norwegian and  Trumpy PTF’s, and point to references about their combat Ops in Vietnam  to the extent that some of this information is now being declassified.  I  was still in Navy schools / training when that effort was ongoing.  CRD21  certainly wasn’t Vietnam, the Canadians were very friendly, but there we  were, sometimes freezing, roaring around the Great Lakes.</p>
<p><em><strong>Take a tour</strong> of PTF-17 as it was assigned to  Coastal River Division 21,  an element of Coastal River Squadron 2.  See  photo’s of main systems, weapons, communications, engineering etc.   Included are photo’s of PTF 18 and 19 as well as the Patrol Gunboats   Asheville, Crockett and Marathon, PG’s 84, 88 and 89.</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<p><strong>Communications /Electronics Equipment</strong>: All tactical  combat units require the ability to move, shoot and communicate.  So  let’s start with Comms since command and control is essential to the mission.  There is almost no information on the Web describing the communications systems on PTF&#8217;s so I will attempt to fill in some of that void. (Since I was also a Ham Radio operator and an electronics engineer, this aspect of the boats was also of particular interest to me.)</p>
<p><strong>Afloat</strong>:</p>
<p>PTF-17 had HF, VHF and UHF transceivers to cover most comms needs.  Our plain language call sign was Culpepper Sierra 17, quite a mouth  full, so we normally used simply “One-Seven”, particularly between the  boats.  The CRD21 callsign was Richard November, AKA “Two-One”.</p>
<p>The photo below shows the radio room of PTF-17.  On the right, top is  the HF transceiver ARC-94.  Its control head is behind the white  stanchion just above the CW key.  Below the ARC-94 is the ARC-27 UHF  transceiver – its control head is up on the bridge.  On the operating  table we see the SB-315 CW key and to the left of that is the  VRC-46/RT-524 VHF transceiver.  It is locally tuned and has a C-1138  remote control on the bridge.  Above the VRC-46 are the three AM-215/U  audio amplifiers.  These can select any radio output, amplify it and  route it to any speaker or handset.  There are also various junction  boxes and patch panels in view.   A compact, efficient space.  This view  is looking outboard, forward is to the right.</p>
<p><em>Photo: Tim Sammons</em></p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 639px"><img src="../wp-content/uploads/PTF17-Radio-Room_NEW.jpg" alt="" width="629" height="807" /><p class="wp-caption-text">PTF-17 Radio Room equipment  N6CC</p></div>
<p><strong>HF</strong>:   We had an AN/ARC-94, based upon the Collins  618T aircraft transceiver operating from 2-30 MHz which was mounted in  an overworked shock mount in the radio room.  The radio Room was  approximately under the port side 20 mm gun mount.  This radio provided  SSB, CW and AM capability with 400 watts PEP output on SSB but we only  used SSB. (plus an occasional AM radio check with some surprised CB’er  on 27.065 MC).  It drove a Collins 490T antenna matching unit which was  mounted on the after bulkhead of the chart room and it was connected to  the port side 28 foot fiberglass whip antenna.  Some photo’s of these  boats while in Vietnam show the two HF whips mounted forward of the  bridge, braced with supports to the bridge structure.  Sometime later,  they were moved further aft to the positions seen in my photo’s.  Also,  our fold-down main mast seems to have been a later modification.  Some  Vietnam photo’s don’t show this mast.</p>
<p>The radio drove an H-169/U handset remote unit on the bridge and its  normal aircraft control panel for frequency and mode selection was  mounted in the radio room.  The radio was powered by the boats’ 28 VDC  batteries as well as a 28V-115V 3 phase 400 cps rotary “inverter” which  was located in the weapons locker in the passageway across from the  head.  The radio could be operated locally in the radio room via an  RS-38 Mic plugged directly into the transceiver.</p>
<p>The NAVSHIPS Technical  Manual (see Reference (10)) for the PTF-17  Class also shows the CW-only AN/GRC-109 as standard, installed equipment. Also interesting, the Manual for PTF’s 9-16 (the last 8 Norwegian  boats) shows a nice photo of a Collins TCS AM and CW HF Radio set in the Radio  Room and notes this radio was installed equipment.  The photo also shows the TCS Loading Coil, required for use with a  28 foot whip on the lower frequencies.   It appears that the TCS’s were aboard the 9-16 boats while in Vietnam as the primary HF radio.  Interesting, considering that the same Collins TCS was the primary radio system used in the WWII PT boats.  More on that later.</p>
<p>As the Staff Electronics Materiel Officer for CRD21 (collateral duty)  I was responsible for making sure all the shore and afloat equipment  was working and supported properly.  Curiously, the GRC-109 transmitters  were not connected to an antenna even though the PTF’s had a second 28  foot whip on the starboard side of the bridge.  There was no provision  for any antenna matching and in fact, I recall that the receivers and AC  power supplies were missing when we received the boats.  The  transmitter was bolted to the radio room forward bulkhead, about eye  level and there was an SB-315A/U CW key located on the operating desktop  next to the VRC-46.  Since the ’109 was not complete or operative on  any of the boats I initiated a request to Division and Squadron for a  BOATALT (boat alteration) to remove them.  It was approved and they were  excessed; one less mystery problem to deal with but we never received a  modern replacement for them.  (If someone can get aboard PTF-17 at the  Servicemen’s Museum in Buffalo, please take a picture of the forward  bulkhead and note the position of the GRC-109 mounting holes – I’d  appreciate it!).</p>
<p>I don’t recall the ARC-94 being connected to the CW key.  The radio  was capable of operating CW via the Mode switch on the control panel,  but I don’t remember ever using it that way.  As a Ham, I would have  been all over that, and our Radiomen in the crews were all CW qualified  in those days but I don’t think we ever used that mode.  Most of our  comms were tactical boat-to-boat so CW would not have been useful there.   Comms back to base were another matter, just like in Vietnam.</p>
<p>During the war, the GRC-109 was relied upon extensively for comms  back to Da Nang during raids in their operating areas off North Vietnam.   Ref (7) indicates they used the following freqs for CW with the  GRC-109 (incorrectly identified as the CIA RS-1 in the document):    Transmit/Receive:  4069.3/8217, 4258/4632, 6220/3493 KC as primary,  secondary and tertiary circuits respectively.  Split T/R operation would  have been routine and its likely the Ops officers/OinC’s had authority  to pick the best freqs for day/night operations, the “hot work”  happening mainly at night.</p>
<p>A 28 foot whip would be resonant around 8.3 MC.  However with its  feedline and ground line to the bronze ground plate along the keel, in a  wood hull, the resonant frequency would be somewhat lower.  The 4 and 6  MC transmit freqs would have seen a capacitive load without any  matching devices; the receivers would have worked fine.  They probably  just tuned up and let the ’109 grunt out CW.  I’ll have to try that  setup with mine to see how they handle it.  While at aboard PTF-17 I did run my  Heathkit SB-102 SSB Transceiver into the starboard whip without a tuner  on 40 meters Ham frequencies and it worked great,  I’m sure the  GRC-109′s did the job, mine always does.</p>
<p>Here’s a shot of the Heathkit SB-102 SSB transceiver aboard PTF-17 during a Ham Radio Field Day back then, probably 1975.  The starboard HF whip antenna is visible outside the bridge window. <em> </em><img title="SB-102 Aboard PTF-17 for Field Day 1975" src="../wp-content/uploads/Ham-Radio-Aboard-PTF-17_NEW.jpg" alt="" width="574" height="567" /></p>
<p>Back to the ARC-94′s.  We used the HF radios on occasion,  particularly when we were underway around the Great Lakes on various  training and recruiting port visits.  We had several HF freqs available  but mostly used 6970 KC USB which covered the ranges of interest.  They  had no squelch so they were a bit annoying being turned up to overcome  the formidable engine noise when at-speed.  One day the USS Marathon ran  into a problem while transiting the St Lawrence Seaway, inbound to  Great Lakes from Guam.  They called us on 6970 KC’s, we had good comms  and got them the assistance they needed.  This was before Cell Phones  don’tchya know!</p>
<p>Again, Reference (7) has noted the availablity of SSB voice (for the ARC-94,  misidentified in Ref (7) as the “GRC-94″) and assigned SSB freq’s in  combat aboard the PTF’s but it appears it was not used much.  However,  elsewhere in Reference (7) it states that HF SSB radios, UHF radios, IFF  gear and the forward 40 mm gun mount were removed at Subic prior to Ops  off North Vietnam.  (Conflicting references, more research is needed here but the unclassified record is pretty thin.)  During covert intel ops, psyops and full-on raids,  HF SSB  would have been too easy to intercept; no crypto capability,  using a complex and possibly less-than-reliable radio system.  The  intercept problem would have been serious since the boats primarily  operated with South Vietnamese navy crews who spoke the same language as  the NVA/VC so it would have been easy to perform  COMMINT against them.   Encrypted CW would have been more secure.  The operating areas in the Tonkin Gulf off  North Vietnam were around 200-250 miles over sea water from Da Nang, so a  10 watt,  GRC-109 sending coded CW would do the job pretty reliably.  I  wonder what the tropical static noise sounded like with all that  lightning around.</p>
<p><strong>VHF</strong>:  On VHF we relied upon the trusty  AN/VRC-46/RT-524 FM radio also mounted in the Radio Room.  It covered  30-75 MC with output of around 35 watts into the AS-1729/VRC whip  antenna.  We used the VRC-46 for 90% of our Comms as it was reliable and  had SQUELCH!  The whip was on the forward starboard side of the bridge  and the radio used a C-1138 remote control box with H-189/U handset on  the bridge.  A great radio system that could handle the pounding that  often caused the other radios to fail.</p>
<p>Our primary freq was 39.00 MC.  Apparently that freq was also common  to US Army armor units at Ft Knox, infantry units at Bragg and other  Army units in the country because we often talked with them when “skip”  propagation was in.  Pretty reliable, pretty often.  We talked with guys  in tanks, APC’s, CP’s and even some PRC-25′s being humped around.  We  also worked an Army helo once – indicated by rotor blade modulation of  his signal.  We’d ask “how’s the chow”, they wanted to know “how’s the  fishing”….  When we got back in, we could look up their daily callsign  and find out who/where they were.  You could always tell when you were  talking to a VRC-46 – the cooling blower and HV switching supply for the  output tube had a distinct, loud background whine.  The Russian REK  (Radioelectronic Kombat)  guys would have had a field day with us…</p>
<p>We also carried a PRC-25 (or was it a 77?).  Our SEAL team used it  when going ashore on training exercises in their IBS, Inflatable Boat  Small.  Great radio, always worked.  I remember when the message came in  directing all PRC-25 owners to install the battery vent device in the  side of the battery boxes.  Apparently the new batteries out gassed  hydrogen and some cigar-smoking RTO probably blew himself up with one.  I  believe that message was actually the first directive establishing The  Great Nanny-State we presently find ourselves in.</p>
<p>The VRC-46 system worked well but as stated earlier, it was not quite  enough to make it from our gunnery training areas back to base.  I  experimented by installing another AS-1729 whip on the top of our  foldable mast, getting it somewhat higher and more in the clear.  It  made about a 15% improvement in range so I submitted a BOATALT request  up the chain and got it approved for the PTF’s.</p>
<p><strong>UHF</strong>:  We had an AN/ARC-27 aircraft radio, a very  heavy 1950′s beast that we used to talk with aircraft and occasionally  each other.  The antenna was the Navy standard AS-390 “spider” up on the  mast.  H-169/U handset and a small Channel Select panel up on the  bridge.  The ARC-27 in the Radio Room would wear out the overworked  shock mounts on a regular basis and then fail.  We had a deal with the  Naval Air Station at Glenview Illinois to provide us repair support as  that was still a common radio in Mil aircraft as was the ARC-94.  They’d  fix our gear, we would take them for rides.</p>
<p>We also talked with their P-3 Orions of VP-60 as they &#8220;searched for  subs&#8221; in the deeper sections of the Lakes, on their way out to the  Atlantic to track the real Russian subs operating off our coast. The P-3&#8242;s used to like sneaking up on us from astern, blasting by  us at low altitude when we were underway.  They left a big wake in the  water from those 4 big turboprops.  The lookouts spotted them long  before, so we were ready.  Hitting them with the morse letter “G” from  the signal lights, the standard exercise surrogate for Gunfire; they  buzzed off, probably not knowing morse code or surface warfare training  trivia.  Ha Ha, we got ya – BS!  We got you…</p>
<p>We did a fair amount of search and rescue training with the US Coast  Guard units at Chicago.  They flew H-3 Helo’s and we did many underway  transfers of simulated litter patients, usually simulated by a case of  beer wrapped inside a kapok life jacket lashed to a stokes stretcher.   We quickly learned the “helo static electricity grounding stick trick”.   Grabbing a stokes stretcher hung by a steel cable from a helo while  standing on the aluminum soft-patch over the engine room provided quite a  static electricity jolt!  Build a whack-stick from a piece of pipe,  ground wire to the deck plate and whack the stretcher BEFORE you touched  it – helo rotors could build up a lotta volts…  <em>Photo Below:  Tim Sammons</em></p>
<p><img src="../wp-content/uploads/H3-PTF-Ops.jpg" alt="" width="553" height="793" /></p>
<p><strong>Fun Fact</strong>: The UHF radio came in handy one day while  we were firing 81 mm mortar illumination flares and the .50 Cal in a  daytime training exercise.  A lookout reported incoming aircraft (CEASE  FIRE!) and soon a TWA 727 jet buzzed us about 2000 feet above the water  in a hard left bank.  The firing area was in the south-center part of  the lake and was apparently under a VOR path into O’Hare airport.  The  pilot apparently thought we were in distress by seeing all the flares,  he was still too far away to see the .50 Cal TRACERS! So I figured I  would call him on the UHF Guard freq of 243.0 MC.  All aircraft guard  that freq, right?</p>
<p>Wrong, but the control tower at Naval Air Station Glenview did and replied, asking  why Navy PT Boat-17 was calling unknown TWA 727 in the Lake Michigan  Controlled Firing Area on the aircraft emergency frequency.  I explained  the situation to him, he got on the O’Hare tower freq and called off  the 727.  Probably a rare occasion for an airliner pilot to buzz a PT  boat.  He was probably an Air Force Reserve C-130 zoomie on drill  weekends.  Commence firing.</p>
<p>We also had a PRC-41 UHF manpack.  Used it to talk with the Helo’s  occasionally but rarely carried it.  I think we got it from salvage  along with the batteries and charger.  Comshaw….</p>
<p>Here’s another shot of underway Air Ops with the Coast Guard.   Standard Air Ops procedure<em> </em>was  to pick a course (assuming you had clear navigation) to put the  relative wind 30 degrees off the port bow at about 20 knots.  This  allowed the helo to fly directly into the relative wind and permit the  pilot to see what’s going on. (Helo pilots usually sit in the right-hand  seat unlike in fixed wing aircraft).  This also allowed the winch  operator to get a good view of the situation.  They look like they are  “crabbing” into the wind but they are not.   <em>Photo:  Tim Sammons</em></p>
<p><img title="PTF Air Ops" src="../wp-content/uploads/PTF-Air-Ops.jpg" alt="" width="781" height="531" /></p>
<p><strong>Marine Band VHF:</strong> We carried a Raytheon RAY-50 on the  bridge for talking with the many civilian boats in the area.   Particularly in the FIRING AREA.  These people were clueless, having  never read a Notice To Mariners requiring them to stay clear of this  charted location.  (Come to think of it, that TWA pilot probably didn’t  read the Notice to Airmen that we also routinely sent out.  But I’m glad  he looked anyway).</p>
<p>We would also use the RAY-50 to talk with the Locks operator on the  Chicago River when we needed to clear the locks, occasional drawbridge  operators and particularly iron ore and grain boats plying the Great  Lakes.  These guys would  travel to/from Chicago right through the  firing area and would rarely answer a call on Channel 16 or 13  (bridge-to-bridge).  We’d pull up alongside and hit the horn to chase  them away and if anyone even appeared on the bridge wing, they’d just  shrug and keep going.  Time is money ya know and I gotta get back to the  Poker game!  Sheesh!</p>
<p><strong>Other Electronics:</strong> The PTF’s had a gyro compass, a  Mark 27 Mod O as I recall.  Pretty reliable but would become uncaged if  we pounded down off some big waves.  (back to the magnetic compass). A  gyro repeater was on the bridge and it was also sync’d to the main radar  and radar remote on the bridge.  Good gear.  We carried a Canadian Marconi LN-66 radar  as well.  Very reliable and could spot a DIW PT boat about 4 miles out,  much further if it was as speed because the rooster tail in the wake  showed up more than the boat did.  We could see a PG gunboat at about10  miles.  We also had a fathometer (couldn’t detect fish) and a pit sword  for speed indication read out by cool Nixie Tubes.</p>
<p><strong>Fun Fact</strong>:  In 1974 the line of zero degrees of  magnetic variation ran down the west side of Lake Michigan.  Also, when the guns were locked down in their cruise positions, the  wood hull of the boat did not influence the magnetic compass.  Therefore True  north and Magnetic north were in the same direction; the gyro and  magnetic compass read the same.  No need to use the old Navigators  memory trick:  <strong>True Virgins Make Dull Company At Weddings</strong>.  If you were ever a Navy navigator, you know what that means.</p>
<p><strong>Fun Fact</strong>:  It’s easy to tell a Norwegian – built PTF   from a Trumpy boat at a distance.  The Trumpy LN-66 radar antenna was a  straight, rectangular “slotted waveguide” antenna.  The Norwegian  Nasty’s had a Decca radar with a prominently curved reflector-horn  antenna *.  Also, any PTF photo showing a 40 mm gun mounted on the bow  is a Norwegian-built boat – the Trumpy’s always had the 81mm  Mortar/Browning M2 .50 Cal machine gun combo on the bow.  After arrival  in SEA the Norwegian boats also had the 81/50 weapon on the bow as a  replacement for their 40 mm guns. Positive visual ID features.</p>
<p>(* There is a photo identified in Reference (17) as PTF-13 (Norwegian -built) with some  experimental guns installed.  It sports the straight LN-66 Radar  antenna, the only exception I have found.  PTF-13 was apparently kept  stateside as a training and a Tech Evaluation boat during the war. The LN-66 radar was apparently being evaluated for future incorporation in the new-construction boats starting with PTF-17.)</p>
<p><strong>ADF</strong>: When we got the boats back from Vietnam they  had a curious automatic radio direction finder (ADF) system aboard.   Very handy off the coast during radar EMCON, when outside NVA artillery  range or in making lengthy transits. (we didn’t carry any celestial  navigation gear or pubs, although we were qualified).</p>
<p>The rotating loopstick antenna was inside about a 6 inch square, 2  inch thick block mounted on a mast between the bridge and the forward  centerline ammo ready service locker.  The electronics and readout was  in the chart room and it was strange indeed.  It was a US Mil aircraft  ADF system of some sort as indicated by the aircraft-type control panel  and azimuth display dial.  But they were mounted in a metal box, about 1  foot cube, obviously made by an unemployed automotive sheet metal  worker at Subic and spray painted (kinda) in haze gray.  What a kludge.  The metal looked like it was cut with a cold chisel and nothing was  square.  Also, it didn’t work on any of the boats.  Another BOATALT  request up the chain and they are gone (but a good ADF system would have  been very useful and we never got a replacement system).</p>
<p>The boats also had a NANCY infrared signaling system.  It consisted  of an incandescent light bulb inside an infrared glass dome filter  mounted up on the mast.   It is the black-looking hemisphere on the mast  in the USCG Helo photo, above.  We had an IR viewer (SAR-7 I recall) so  we could see it, the naked eye could not.  The light was controlled by a  box to the helmsman’s left on the bridge bulkhead, either continuous  “on”, pulsating or keyable in morse code with a key depending upon where  the function switch was set..</p>
<p><strong>Fun Fact</strong>:  We would do frequent “cat and mouse” ops,  under radar EMCON conditions  with the other boats, trying to  infiltrate some remote, long coastal area undetected by the other  boat(s) that were patrolling it.  One night, we were the patrol, PTF-18  was going to try to insert the SEALS in.  Earlier that day, I had  sauntered over to PTF-18, turned their NANCY beacon &#8220;ON&#8221; in the pulsating  mode and then removed the selector switch knob and repositioned it, pointing  towards the “OFF” position.  We could see them coming miles away – they  never figured it out.</p>
<p><strong>Visual Signaling</strong>:  In addition to the NANCY system,  we had two 8″ signal lights mounted behind the bridge, port and  starboard.  They were the mechanical shutter type for sending morse  code.  They had different colored filters, including infrared and could  be used as clear searchlights as well.  Pretty effective, simple gear –  it worked.  The light(s) could be removed and our M-60 machine guns  mounted in the pintle’s in their place.  We also carried a limited Flag  Bag, consisting of an Ensign, Jack, Golf (if you were the Guide in  formation ops), a 21 Division pennant, Oscar (man overboard) and a Bravo  flag for fueling, and gunnery ops.</p>
<p>We also carried an early GEN 1 starlight scope with mounts for an M-16 rifle.</p>
<p><strong>Fun Fact</strong>:  One warm, moonless  Saturday night at  Zero-Dark-Thirty, we were idling  along the beach, darken ship (looking  for VC infiltrators).  Intel had us off Lake Forest Illinois, the home  of a fancy liberal arts college – there were probably plenty of enemy  sympathizers  in the area.  Movement!  The starlight scope detected much  hanky-panky happening among the college students in the bushes along  the beach. Until we hit them with the search lights and then hit the  engines.  Pandemonium!  Now, more enemy sympathizers…</p>
<p>Here is an ancient copy of the Underway Check Off list we posted – stuff you needed to do prior to takeoff.</p>
<p><img title="PTF-17 Underway Checkoff List" src="../wp-content/uploads/Underway-Checklist.pdf-pages.jpg" alt="" width="389" height="609" /></p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 898px"><img class=" " title="PTF-17 Bridge" src="../wp-content/uploads/PTF-17-Bridge_NEW.jpg" alt="" width="888" height="614" /><p class="wp-caption-text">PTF-17 Bridge 1974   N6CC.COM</p></div>
<p><strong>The Front Office</strong>:  Below is a shot of the Bridge.   Along the dashboard is the pelorus, underneath, left to right:   Windshield wiper switch, Gyro-compass repeater, VRC-46 speaker, pit log  (Knot-Ometer), C-1138 remote control for the VRC-46.  On the panel, left  to right:  Helm (hydraulic steering), magnetic compass, engine RPM  indicators, rudder-angle indicator, throttle/transmission levers, engine  warning lights, fire detection warning lights, navigation lights  switchboard, cease fire horn buttons for 4 main weapons, and LN-66 radar  repeater.  Along the vertical bulkhead are 2 weather tight H-169/U  handset holders (HF and UHF usually patched to them) and a small door  hiding the ARC-27 UHF radio control box.  The sound powered phones were  usually worn by the OOD but sometimes the helmsman depending upon the  evolution.  Off to the right out of the photo are the depth indicator,  General Quarters and Collision Alarm switches.  Behind the bridge crew  are 2 weatherproof speakers for the radios (loud!).  The Ray 50 VHF  Marine Band radio was mounted behind the watertight door down to CIC but  the door was kept open while underway.  <em>Photo:  Tim Sammons</em></p>
<p><strong>Hull / Overall Design:</strong></p>
<p>As stated earlier, the hull<strong> </strong>of PTF-17, like the Norwegian boats<strong> </strong>was  made of wood, 7 different kinds I was told.  Oak keel, mahogany  planking, ash frames, elm stringers, douglas fir plywood decks  etc.  The Trumpy-built  boats were built in the US but the keels and stem assemblies were  apparently imported from Norway as part of the licensing deal.  The  boats were 80 feet long with a 24 foot beam, 6 feet wider than the WWII  Elco boats.  This permitted the installation of more weapons, equipment  and crew, and especially to contain ten 600 gallon diesel fuel tanks  amidships.  This was a “planning hull” and above about 25 knots or so,  the entire sides from the chine to the rub rail and the entire  transom were dry.  Above 30 knots, the Bull Nose would drop and you were  cooking.</p>
<p>The bad news was that broad beam made operation is rough water pretty   tough as it would not slice down through the waves like a narrower  hull  would.  We came down so hard sometimes the shock would trip  circuit  breakers on the main switchboard OFF as the breaker handles  kept going down but the boat didn’t.  It was also tough on  legs, knees  and ankles at times.  It wasn’t the North Atlantic but Lake Michigan had  some very rough weather with big waves but since the fetch was  relatively short, the wave period was fast (they were close together).   You didn’t go up and down on swells, you tended to crash through them.   As a consequence, of the several hundred photo’s I took at CRD21, I have  very few of PTF’s at-speed; you were trying too hard just to hang on  and holding a camera steady (or keeping it dry) wasn’t going to happen.</p>
<p>The Great Lakes supposedly has the highest number of shipwrecks per  square mile than any other body of water on earth – I believe it.   Lake  Michigan alone has over 3000 shipwrecks of substantial size plus  innumerable smaller pleasure craft.  The 730 foot Edmund Fitzgerald ore  freighter encountered such weather in Lake Superior and disappeared and  sank without a trace or even a distress call.</p>
<p>Another Great Lakes hazard to navigation were “deadheads”.  These  were telephone poles or other large caliber wooden pilings that a  zillion docks, quay walls and dolphin mooring posts were made of.   During the winter ice-over, the ice would grab the poles and when the  lake rose (due to a low-pressure weather system moving in), it took the  piling up a few inches with it.  After awhile they worked themselves out  of the bottom and the ice dragged them off as it shifted around.  Since  they were waterlogged at the bottom and bouyant at the top, they  floated vertically, often just awash with the surface.  You had to keep a  sharp lookout for them and they made night ops particularly scary since  you could not see them on radar until it was too late.  Hit one of  these and you had a big hole below the water line – or no more screws or  rudders.  Another example that “Eternal Vigilance is the Price of  Safety”.  Fortunately, none of us ever hit one but there were a few  close-calls.</p>
<p>The hulls were “plywood” just like the WWII boats.  This is not the  4×8 sheets you get at Home Depot (although the deck and pilot house were made of laminated plywood).  The hull was made of 2 layers of  narrow mahogany planks, about 6″ wide each.  The inner planks were about  45 degrees to the keel, the outer planks roughly parallel to the keel.   The outer planks were about 1/2 thick, the inner planks somewhat  thicker. There was a waterproof, resilient adhesive coating (not fiberglass as some have reported) between the  plank layers and they were screwed to the frames, stringers and fish-plates with  stainless steel wood screws.  The WWII PT boats had over 400,000 wood screws holding them together.  Our boast must have had at least that many. Very strong.</p>
<p>I think the Frames were on 12 or 14″  centers.  Light, flexible, strong, hard to build, easy to repair.   PTF-17 had several Vietnam-era bullet/shrapnel  holes in the hull – the repairs can  be seen inside covered with odd wood block patches glued and  screwed to the inner planks at various places among the more regular fishplates.  The outside holes were  probably filled with Bondo or something.  The hull planking was removed, replaced and repaired many times during overhaul at Subic during the Vietnam war years.</p>
<p>Here’s a May, 1967 photo of PTF-17 under construction at John Trumpy  and Sons.  Naval Photographic Center, Wash DC.  From ptfnasty.com  website.</p>
<p><img title="PTF-17 under construction" src="../wp-content/uploads/PTF17bldgTrumpy.jpg" alt="" width="582" height="469" /></p>
<p>I managed to bang into the corner of steel pier while pulling out of a  berth on the Huron River, backing into where it empties into the St  Claire River.   I scraped about a 24″  long gouge in the  outer  planking, punching a 6″ hole through the inner planking about 12 inches  above the water line.    It cracked a hull frame about midway down the  port side engine room.  Oh Crap!  Tied back up, the crew screwed a piece  of 3/4″ Marine plywood over the hole and we were off again.  Oh, except  they painted it like a big white Band Aid.  I deserved it..  Point is,  easy to screw up but also easy to repair.  Our “ships carpenter”, QMC  “Barney”, made an expert repair of the frame and both layers of planking  when we returned back to base.  If you can get aboard PTF-17 in  Buffalo, look at the engine room portside near the exhaust pipe and  check out my  handi-work!</p>
<p>One April day we were departing Peterson Boat Builders in Sturgeon  Bay Wisconsin after a winter overhaul.  It was PTF-18, I was XO at the  time. The lake had cleared of ice a few weeks ago (so we thought) and as  we zig-zagged (see below) down the canal, we felt a bump.</p>
<p>Investigating, we discovered we had hit an awash ice floe which  knocked about a 6 inch hole in the starboard side below the waterline,   just aft of the water tight bulkhead in the lazarette;  it was starting  to flood.  We could have gotten out to the main lake area and hit the  gas – getting up on step would have put the hole above the water and the  lazarette would have drained itself.  In an abundance of caution, and  not wishing to hit any more ice at-speed, we did some basic damage  control (COLD WATER), energized the bilge pump and headed back to  Sturgeon Bay.  Of course, the P-250 pump test-ran fine at the pier, now  it wouldn’t start in the cold out on the lake.  Radioing ahead, they met  us at the pier with a crane holding a huge concrete clump anchor.  As  we pulled in, we put some dunnage on the port bow and they lowered the  clump.  Bow goes down, stern goes up, hole now out of water.  A day  later, back underway again.</p>
<p>Apparently PTF&#8217;s-19 and 17 &#8220;traded some paint&#8221; during a personnel-transfer; shortly before they departed for Little Creek upon decommissioning of CRD-21 in 1976.  I remember hearing about it with Chief Barney doing some repairs on the forward &#8220;rub rail&#8221; on the 19 boat.  PTF-18 was hit by the Naval Station LCVP boat while the former was moored to the pier.  The LCVP knocked about an 8&#8243; square hole in the transom, outboard of the starboard exhaust pipe.  Again, easy to repair.</p>
<p>We carried about 15-20 crew members at a time when the Reservists were aboard for training; the boats being designed for 4 officers and 20 crew  depending upon the mission and weapons  requirements.  There were 4 racks in the Wardroom and 14 in the crews  quarters, accounting for those on watch – “hot bunking” it’s called.</p>
<p>The hull was fairly immune to gross trim changes when loaded with  fuel and ammo – it rode about the same when when lightly loaded.  It  weighed 65 tons dry, about 80 tons when fully loaded, the broad beam  accounting for this trim stability with the center of gravity not  changing much as we burned fuel.  With 6000 gallons of fuel aboard we  could go 860 miles at 38 knots, 960 miles at 35 knots or 1050 miles at  20 knots.  A standard highway fuel tanker truck carries 6000 gallons for  those volumetrically-challenged folks.</p>
<p>Draft at the screws at 75 tons was 6’10″ and at the bottom of the  keel was 3’9″ so you could nose into a beach or mud bank if the bottom  dropped off quickly.   These were not “PBR” River boats – PTF’s were  used in the South China Sea off North Vietnam and the engines were  pretty unhappy if you had to idle along in shallow water for very long.   With both engines at dead idle (750 RPM) you were doing about 12 knots,  much to the angst of the Coast Guard while in “no wake zones”.  The  rudders were pretty ineffective at low speeds so you would steer zig-zag  with the engines (idle or in neutral) to maintain steerage way at low  speeds.  With those big 4 foot screws, set wide apart and powered by  monster engines, they were otherwise pretty maneuverable at low speed.  Going slow in a straight line required “pulsing” both engines, something  the engines, transmissions, clutches  and engineers didn’t like.   Carbon and all that…</p>
<p>The boats would easily make 45 knots when lightly loaded in fresh  water, especially if it was a really cold outside with cold, (dense) air  being sucked in by the big turbo superchargers screaming away.  They  would be a bit faster in sea water (higher density, more prop-bite, more  mass for the prop to accelerate). We rarely went above 40 knots as  there was no real need and engines were very expensive – they required  overhaul when reaching 20 cumulative hours above 2100 RPM.  Overhaul was  at still Subic Bay in the PI.  More on that later…</p>
<p><strong>FUN FACT:</strong> You can visually estimate the speed of one  of these boats.  In calm water at a typical loading the keel cuts the  water just under the 81mm mortar mount when the boat is at 40 knots and  under the centerline 81mm ready service locker at 45 knots; more forward  when slower.  The photo on the front page was taken at around 20 knots,  not yet up on step.</p>
<p>Camouflage:  While in Vietnam, and as we received them, they were  painted in Marine Formula 123 lustreless green.  A good general purpose  camouflage.  Not Haze Gray because they routinely operated close to the  beach when doing Hot Work.  Haze Gray is for TARGETS and other big, fat,  slow, gray floating hazards to navigation like destroyers etc…One  blogger at another PTF site stated that the Naval Training Center  ordered us to paint the boats in &#8220;that hideous camouflage pattern&#8221;.  Not  so! – it was our idea. (The Commander NTC actually wanted us to paint  them Haze Gray since that’s what The Real Navy looked like. To him.)</p>
<p>Over the winter overhaul period of 1974-75, I had suggested to  Commodore Johnston that we try different Camo schemes to evaluate how  effective they were.  He enthusiastically agreed so we drew up some  sample ideas based upon some WWII patterns.  He got the OK from Squadron  so off we went.  We tried the wavy pattern on PTF-17 placing Haze Gray  and flat black  waves on top of the Marine 123 on all vertical surfaces.   The 19 Boat got  Leopard Spots consisting of Haze Gray amoebas with  flat black centers, also on top of Marine 123.  The 18 Boat got Razzle  Dazzle triangle splinters of Haze Gray with  flat black interiors, also  on Marine 123.  This was NOT to try to look inconspicuous while at-sea.   In all cases, the decks and other horizontal surfaces were kept 123  green.  Remember, this is the Green Water Navy, not brown water or blue  water….</p>
<p>We did some visibility test by running close-aboard the beach and  viewed from seaward, in different lighting conditions at differing  ranges.  Depending upon the background, the 17 and 19 boats were pretty  well hidden, the 18 Boat not so much.  In all cases we were running at  slow speed – nothing you could do would hide the big white Rooster Tail  in the wake at speed.  We would imagine that hugging the shoreline the  camo would be somewhat effective when viewed by a Mach 1 Fast Mover  heading for the Officers Club.  Especially if the decks were also  camouflaged.  Just another “lump”.  When painted solid 123 green they  were more obvious against a typical shoreline, looking like an odd solid  dark shape – out of place.. And what are those muzzle FLASHES !?</p>
<p>The 18 Boat was different with the Razzle Dazzle triangles.  With  triangle bases offset from structural vertical features, it was a bit  difficult to ascertain the “target angle” of the boat you were looking  at.  This is the bearing the PT boat presented to you, from their  perspective.  It was meant to confuse gunners or fire control viewers  about exactly which way you were going.  Intended to be confusing for a  few critical seconds, it worked pretty well for us and apparently very  well in the WWII boats (including large Capital ships) as witnessed by  many photos of them sporting this design.  However, in the end that was  too hard to apply and maintain so Razzle Dazzle was dropped in favor of  simpler designs during WWII.  We eventually went back to solid 123 green  at the end of the experiments and when the paint just wore out.  Great  leaders, willing to experiment without fear of offending or upsetting  someone.  It fit in with our mission &#8211; and attitude.</p>
<p>Here’s a shot of the PTF’s on the marine railway after being hoisted  by the new synchrolift.  They were pulled in the winter for overhaul but  primarily to prevent damage from the thick ice that formed in the  harbor.  When frequent storms blew in, the ice smashed itself into big  chunks and anything it contacted.  That’s my 1971 Ford Bronco – still  driving it but now it sports a desert camo paint job – seen elsewhere on  this site.  <em>Photo Below:  Tim Sammons</em></p>
<p><img title="PTF's in winter overhaul" src="../wp-content/uploads/PTFs-in-overhaul_NEW.jpg" alt="" width="719" height="395" /></p>
<p><strong>Engineering Main Control</strong>:  The below photo shows the  engineers station which was actually in the fuel tank room.  He  monitored all engineering systems while looking aft through the  double-pane window into the engine room.  He had the main engine  run-stop switches and a duplicate set of throttle/transmission controls  although the boat was always controlled from the bridge.  The port and  starboard panels contain the 36 engine cylinder temperature gauges  (rectangular gauges) for each engine, the RPM indicators and the other  gauges to measure sea-suction water temperature, coolant temperature,  lube oil temp and pressure, fuel oil pressure, Vee drive oil pressure  and temperature, turbo-supercharger temperature and pressure, generator  lube oil temperature and pressure and a few other critical things I am  forgetting.  The big gauges read main-start compressed air flask  pressure. That big white cylinder seen through the window is the port  main lube-oil tank.   It was loud in Main Control and unbearably loud  (more like a FEELING) in the engine room, even with ear plugs covered by  mickey-mouse ears.</p>
<p>Photo:  Tim Sammons</p>
<p><img title="PTF-17 Engineering Main Control" src="../wp-content/uploads/Main-Control_NEW.jpg" alt="" width="883" height="614" /></p>
<p><strong>Engines and Vee Drives:</strong></p>
<p>British Napier Deltic T18-37K<strong> </strong>diesel locomotive  engines.  Eighteen opposed-piston cylinders arranged in a compact  triangle (Delta) , 3 crankshafts, 36 pistons, turbo supercharged,  lightweight, aluminum 3100 horsepower (each)  screamers.  Two of them.    Basically converts #2 diesel into noise, spray and adrenalin  …More to  follow.</p>
<p>With its origins back in WWII, the Brits outdid themselves with the  design of this engine.  Not for the faint-at-heart!  Incredible  engineering to produce so much power in such a small volume.  There are  many sites on the Web describing this engine in detail – check them out,  especially the animations.  Suffice to say, there is a lot of hardware  flying around inside this powerhouse.</p>
<p>Below is a photo of a 3100 horsepower Napier Deltic engine sitting on  a shipping stand waiting to be installed in PTF-19. It had just arrived  via USAF C-141 jet transport from Subic Bay, PI.  The main engine  overhaul shop during the war was in Subic and the Navy elected to keep  it there to support us.  That fact and the complexity of these engines  were eventually what caused the PTF program to be killed off during the  Jimmy Carter years – too expensive, no neutrons, not enough  push-buttons.  “They Were Expendable” rears its head again.  But I  digress…..</p>
<p>Like all diesel engines, they are thermodynamically most happy and  efficient when run at a constant speed as in diesel electric locomotives  and ships or as prime movers for generators.  These guys idled at about  750-800 RPM.  As you accelerated through about 1100 RPM they hit a  mechanical resonance which was very ugly and probably damaging – get  through there quickly.  Above about 1300 RPM they were very smooth.   I’ll never forget the sound of them driving that screaming turbo  supercharger.  When you shut them down (cut fuel) they sounded briefly  like a giant dumpster half full of bowling balls being shaken by King  Kong.  Then DEAD, HOT quiet.</p>
<p>The New York City Fire Department had a water pumper truck that used a  Napier Deltic for a water pump engine.  It could shoot a BIG stream of  water 40 stories straight up.  I wonder if they still have it.</p>
<p>PTF-18 had one run away while moored in Port Huron Michigan.  Apparently the bearing seal in the turbo became worn or failed during  start-up and the engine began to suck lube oil into the intake manifold  past this seal.  It started to overspeed, the engineer put engine in  STOP mode, cutting off fuel.  Since it was now running on lube oil vice  fuel oil, it didn’t respond, it kept accelerating until it seized up,  probably at around 8000 RPM (red-line was 2400 RPM).  A memorable  experience to be on board at the time, lemme tell ya.  The engine  destroyed itself with chunks of pistons penetrating the cylinder sleeves  and other shrapnel flying around but fortunately the engine and lube oil  were fairly cool and there was no fire or personnel injuries.  We put  in a BOAT-ALT to plumb a 200 cubic foot CO2 gas cylinder into the turbo  air intakes that could be actuated remotely – that would have stopped  the engine.  We installed the mods on all the boats, never happened  again, naturally and thankfully.  See photo of an aluminum piston  fragment I found in the bilge.  The remains of the 3 piston ring grooves  can be seen.</p>
<p><img title="Napier Deltic piston fragmant - PTF-18" src="../wp-content/uploads/PTF-Piston-Fragment-003.jpg" alt="" width="384" height="288" /></p>
<p>In the photo below, the output shaft coupling to the Vee drives is on  the left and that would face forward in the boat, on the other end is  the turbo-supercharger.  Also at the output end are the phasing gears  that collected power from each of the 3 crankshafts (two turned  clockwise, one turned counterclockwise).  They connected to the  hydraulic clutch and various other engine-driven pumps and machinery.    The Vee drives bolted to the output shafts reversed the direction of  power flow to the screw shafts.  This layout is common in large boats like this and was also found in the two outboard engines of the WWII, 3-engined PT boats.  Their Vee-12 Packard 4M-2500 engines and Vee drives were tiny compared to this  monster.  This arrangement allowed the engines to be placed well aft,  making room for the fuel tanks to sit near the center of gravity of the  boat – keeping it in longitudinal trim as fuel was burned off.  The WWII Packard’s were gasoline powered aircraft-derived engines, this beast is a  diesel locomotive engine.  All 7500 pounds of it although possessing a  high power-to-weight ratio, a bit under 1:2 and very compact for their  power.  Did I mention that we had two of them?  It’s difficult to judge  the size of this engine in the photo although make a note of the  rectangular crankshaft cover with Napier Deltic painted on it. .  <em>Photo:  Tim Sammons</em></p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 896px"><img src="../wp-content/uploads/Napier-Deltic-engine_NEW.jpg" alt="" width="886" height="622" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Napier Deltic PTF Engine</p></div>
<p>Below is another engine (the one that is still installed starboard  side in PTF-17 while in the museum at Buffalo NY).  It sits under the  aluminum engine room soft-patch; its girders are visible here.  Note the  size of that rectangular crankshaft cover next to me.   The engineers  took great pride in their work and this engine room was always spotless.    <em>Photo:  Tim Sammons</em></p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 898px"><img title="PTF-17 Engine Room" src="../wp-content/uploads/Engine-Room-PTF-17_NEW.jpg" alt="" width="888" height="614" /><p class="wp-caption-text">PTF-17 Engine Room under Soft Patch</p></div>
<p>Starboard engine in 1975, the stripped down carcass remains aboard PTF-17 today.  Sad&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>PTF-17 Today:</strong><em> (August 2011) PTF-17 has been  preserved and is currently on display at the Buffalo and Erie County  Naval and Military Park in Buffalo, New York.  She arrived at the Park in 1979. The tank landing ship USS Fairfax County was visiting Great Lakes cities on a goodwill cruise in August 1979, and carried her from her interim home at the Naval Amphibious Base in Little Creek VA. to Buffalo. She is sitting on her  skid on the pier alongside the USS The Sullivans and the USS Little  Rock.  Her current position is 42 degrees 52.65 North, 78 degrees 52.80  West; course 315 True, speed 0 knots.  She is visible on satellite  photos of earth. </em></p>
<p><em> </em><em>When PTF-17 was sent to the museum in Buffalo, it was  in  excellent running condition.  The starboard engine had under 1000   hours on it; I was told that was a near-record holder.  The port engine probably   had less that 200 hours on it – it had been replaced by us in Duluth   Minnesota.  The recent (2002) videos of the engine room of PTF-17 in Buffalo  are a horror.  The  engine room appears to have been comp;etely trashed.  A  big hole  (tourist  access?) had been sawed through the aft engine room  bulkhead (!) and  major parts have been stripped from this engine,  leaving it there  bleeding.  The turbo donut has been stripped from the port engine.  A Vee drive appears to have been pulled out  and then dumped on the deck plates  under the main-control window.  Wiring harnesses are dangling from the overhead. WHY?  WHO ?<br />
She appears to be in &#8220;otherwise&#8221; good condition considering the outside  location and the Buffalo weather, especially in contrast to the rest of  the Navy&#8217;s PTF fleet which has largely been destroyed. Also, I am sure the Museum is strapped for funding just keeping the USS Little Rock and USS The Sullivans afloat and painted out.  Other websites  show PTF-3 and PTF-19 as the only other remaining Nasty-Trumpy boats.</em> <em><em>Osprey&#8217;s 23 and 26 have also survived with major modifications in civilian life.  Photo: Andy Sammons</em></em></p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 788px"><img title="PTF-17 in Buffalo NY, Aug 2011" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/PTF-17-in-Buffalo.jpeg" alt="" width="778" height="581" /><p class="wp-caption-text">PTF-17 On display, Buffalo NY 8/11  N6CC.COM</p></div>
<p><em> </em><em> </em><strong>FUN FACT</strong>:  Despite the black smog behind PTF-17 in  the photo of the boat crossing the wake, these boats ran very clean and  were hard to detect by  exhaust plume unless they were running straight  at you from over the  horizon on a windless day.  (Check out other  photo’s on this Blog).  That photo was taken the day we left winter   overhaul and were back in the water.  In our haste to get moving, we   forgot to open the large underwater main exhaust ports that were   designed to deaden the sound and also to diffuse the exhaust into the   water, another stealth measure.  What this photo shows is the resulting   black plume being forced out the low speed exhaust discharge pipes   through the transom;  the twin 3100 horsepower turbo-supercharged diesel   engines were constipated!  Opening the underwater exhaust valves   cleared it right up -back to normal. Duh…</p>
<p><strong>Weapons Systems:</strong></p>
<p>I will cover this in some detail (see the PTF Firepower Posting in  this Blog), but until I get to it, see Chief Gunners Mate Robert  Stoner’s excellent descriptions in the PTFNASTY.COM website, possibly  WARBOAATS.ORG.<strong> </strong>He rode PTF-18 while I was the XO.</p>
<p>Below: Pre-Fire briefing, 81mm mortar and Browning M2 .50 Cal machine  gun.  The second “sailor” from the left was a local Marine that we  captured from the Great Lakes Marine Barracks.  He was pretty handy to  have around, kinda like Fuji of McHale’s Navy fame.  Come to think of  it, I guess he was our Marine Detachment.<em> Photo Below:  Tim Sammons</em></p>
<p><img title="Pre-Fire briefing" src="../wp-content/uploads/Pre-Fire-brief.jpg" alt="" width="622" height="902" /></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p>Sometime later, the “Duty Marine” loads an 81mm parachute flare into  the mortar.  I think that is Bob Stoner in the foreground.  PTF-18.   <em>Photo Below:  Tim Sammons</em></p>
<p><img title="Loading an 81 mm mortar flare " src="../wp-content/uploads/Loading-the-81_NEW.jpg" alt="" width="685" height="491" /></p>
<p><strong>Auxillary Systems</strong>:</p>
<p>Auxillary systems included two 15 KW Onan diesel generators providing  220 VAC 60 Hz power for the boat.  They were mounted in the engine room  outboard of the Vee drives.  One was sufficient  for our needs so only  one was run at a time.  The Norwegian boats used Perkins diesel  generators and aside from the radar systems (they ran  Decca) the boats  were essentially identical once the forward 40 mm gun mounts were  removed from the Norwegian boats and replaced with the 81mm/.50 Cal M2  on the bow.  With diesel propulsion you could run without AC power in an  emergency.  The boats also had 4 KW electric heaters for the crew but  they were useless in the weather we were working in. Obviously not an issue in Vietnam.   (The boats also had &#8220;air conditioning&#8221; in the crews quarters, but that was equally ineffective.) The Norwegians must have been tough guys.  We had to haul the boats  out of the water in winter when Lake Michigan froze – not much of an  issue in the North Atlantic!</p>
<p>The main critical need for the generators was to power the two big  air compressors needed to supply 500 psi air for the main engine  air-start systems.  You don’t crank these things with an electric motor!   A long shot of canned ether sprayed into the turbo intakes while  cranking fired them right up.  We also has a 28 volt battery system to  start the generators, run the radios, gyro, nav lighting and some  instrumentation. We also had a small electric stove, sink and reefer for  chow but we rarely cooked anything more serious than canned soups etc.   But we had a large coffee pot!</p>
<p>We carried about 130 gallons of fresh water in a tank under the  deckplates just aft of the forward watertight bulkhead but it just fed  the galley and heads.  We had 2 heads and a CHT tank up in the fore-peak  – a really bad place for a CHT tank with all the pounding it took up  there.  So we rarely used the heads, also a major problem to pump out  when alongside.  There was no overboard discharge,  possibly modified  this way for US waters.  There was a guy from NavShips (Mr. Brown – no  kidding!) who visited us periodically to tweak the heads and tank.  I  think that tank was a post-Vietnam addition.  No joy – literally.</p>
<p>FUN FACT:  The battery compartment hydrogen gas vents were the hollow  handrails on the ladder up from the engine room and penetrating the  main deck at the hatch coaming.  Don’t carry that cigarette while  climbing thru the hatch – that’s where they vented.</p>
<p>PTF-18 dead astern.  FORM-1, PTF-17 is Guide.  <em>Photo:  Tim Sammons</em></p>
<p><em> </em></p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 512px"><img title="Underway, FORM-1, PTF17 is Guide" src="../wp-content/uploads/FORM-1-Underway.jpg" alt="" width="502" height="721" /><p class="wp-caption-text">PTF17 Underway, Flags a Flying     N6CC</p></div>
</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.n6cc.com/trumpy_ptf17/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coastal River Division 21 Comm Center</title>
		<link>http://www.n6cc.com/coastal-river-division-21-comm-center</link>
		<comments>http://www.n6cc.com/coastal-river-division-21-comm-center#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 22:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fast Patrol Torpedo Boats - PTF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military Tactical Radios]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n6cc.com/?p=850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CRD21 Comm Center: Well, lets start here because this is one place the boats communicated with (and this site is about Combat Comms!).  We built a shore Comm Center in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CRD21 Comm Center:</p>
<p>Well, lets start here because this is  one  place the boats communicated with (and this site is about Combat  Comms!).  We built a shore Comm Center in  the Great Lakes Naval Base boat house, headquarters for CRD21.  Circa early 1973.  Not many  rules so we got creative  ordering equipment through regular supply  channels, visiting the base  salvage area and generally “comshawing”  anything we needed.  It helped  that the Navy’s Electronic Technician  Class “A” School was at Great  Lakes.  The result was a pretty good setup  that worked well.</p>
<p>As a tactical boat unit, we had no means to transmit or receive Record Traffic (hard-copy Naval Messages) aboard the boats.  Since our shore base HQ was technically &#8220;temporary&#8221; (we could not take it with us) we had no record traffic capability there either.  We were serviced by the Naval Training Center Comm Center who provided that service for us.  We had the radio gear but a mechanical teletype machine would last about 10 seconds aboard a PTF!</p>
<p>We had two URC-32′s,  500 watt output, 2-30 MHz HF SSB transceivers,   an R-1051 HF receiver, an SRC-20, 100 watt 225-400 MHz UHF transceiver,   VRC-46/RT-524 running 35 watts, 30-75 MHz on VHF and a 25 watt  Raytheon  Ray-50 marine band FM radio.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a photo of Ltjg &#8220;F&#8221; clowning with one of the URC-32&#8242;s.  The SRC-20 UHF transceiver is behind him.  The PRC-41 is on the floor to his left.  <em>Photo: Tim Sammons</em></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="URC-32's being &quot;tuned&quot;" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/URC-32s.jpg" alt="" width="653" height="451" /></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a shot of the VRC-46, antenna and audio patch panels, the R-1051 and the PRC-25.  The Ham-M antenna rotator controller is on top of the distribution amplifier.  The chart on the wall assisted in pointing the Yagi antennas at the boats&#8217; operating areas to optimize comms.  The deep pattern nulls from the Yagi&#8217;s allowed us to get a decent LOP (Line of Position) out to the boats if The Skipper wanted to find us out on the Lake someplace &#8211; your basic radio direction finder&#8230;. <em>Photo: Tim Sammons</em></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="CRD21 Radio Room" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/VRC-46_NEW.jpg" alt="" width="700" height="603" /><br />
We installed a 50 foot Rohn  tower on the  roof sporting a vertical Cush Craft 4 element 10 meter  Yagi beam, which  we cut and spaced for our primary tactical freq of  39.00 MC.  Similarly,  we had another vertical Cush Craft 220 yagi  rebuilt for our 239.0 UHF  AM freq and another 11 element Cush Craft  Yagi rebuilt for 156.800 MC,  Channel 16 marine band, with whips for the  Ray 50 and HF transceivers.</p>
<p>The Yagi’s were rotated on a common mast by a Ham-M rotator, with all   that equipment being bought from Amateur Electronic Supply in   Milwaukee. They were surprised when we showed up in a Navy truck with a   government purchase order to buy all this “Ham” stuff.  I see on Google   Earth satellite photo’s that the tower is still there 38 years later.    Hope the Assault Craft Unit was able to put it to use!</p>
<p>The below photo shows the CRD 21 communications tower on the roof of Building 13, CRD21 Headquarters and the NTC Boathouse.  At the top is the 39 MC, 4 element Yagi.  Below that on a common crossarm is the 239 MC Yagi and the 156 MC Yagi&#8217;s.  All 3 rotated by the Ham-M rotator.  Below the rotator on a yardarm are the AS-390 UHF and 156 MC ground plane omni directional antennas.  <em>Photo: Tim Sammons</em></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="CRD21 Antenna Tower" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/CRD21-Antennas_NEW.jpg" alt="" width="567" height="707" /></p>
<p>We also had an AS-1729/VRC whip for the VRC-46. We had an HF wire dipole cut for   6970 KC, our primary HF freq although the URC-32′s were pretty forgiving when used off freq on our other tactical channels.  God bless Tube   amplifiers and the URC-32 couplers!   The Division Commodores, LCDR Jim Roper and LCDR Tim Johnston had a C-1138 Remote Control and handset in their second floor office so they could radio us rudder orders (which they never did – They were great  officers, leaders and bosses).</p>
<p>The beams were handy because we did a lot of training in the Lake   Michigan Controlled Firing Area, well out in the middle of the lake, out   of range of the VRC-46′s / AS-1729 whip ground wave.  The beams made   the difference.</p>
<p>This Comm Center was designed to support our boats and ships during   training work in the Great Lakes area and it performed well.  A good   combination of the Navy supply system, Navy SOP and Ham Radio pragmatism   operating in a “don’t tell me how, just get it done” environment.  The   ET’s did a great job.  More on that later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.n6cc.com/coastal-river-division-21-comm-center/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PTF Firepower</title>
		<link>http://www.n6cc.com/ptf-gunnery</link>
		<comments>http://www.n6cc.com/ptf-gunnery#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:11:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fast Patrol Torpedo Boats - PTF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n6cc.com/?p=896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Gunnery exercises aboard PTF&#8217;s.  (Bad Guys take note&#8230;) Here&#8217;s a &#8220;shot&#8221; of GMG2 &#8220;Bobby&#8221; and GMG2 (SEAL) &#8220;Bob&#8221; preparing to fire an 81 mm mortar flare round.  The Browning M2 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gunnery exercises aboard PTF&#8217;s.  (<strong>Bad Guys take note&#8230;</strong>)  Here&#8217;s a &#8220;shot&#8221; of GMG2 &#8220;Bobby&#8221; and GMG2 (SEAL) &#8220;Bob&#8221; preparing to fire an 81 mm mortar flare round.  The Browning M2 .50 Cal has been dismounted.  Bobby has pulled up on the trigger &#8220;cock&#8221; handle which retracts the mortar firing pin.  Sliding the round home, the weapon can be pointed horizontally in a &#8220;direct fire&#8221; mode and fired by pulling the trigger.  An 81 mm howitzer.</p>
<p>You can see the mortar sight quadrant near the sound-powered phone mouthpiece.  Sets azimuth and elevation, which in conjunction with range tables and the number of propellant increments clipped on, determines where the round will hit.  More or less..</p>
<p>It can also be fired in the conventional mortar-mode by not retracting the firing pin.  It goes off once the round contacts the pin.  A very effective weapon.  A common usage would be (at night) to fire a flare round over the target&#8217;s head, well beyond him and illuminating him from behind &#8211; then you fire your main weapons at his sillouette.  It also reduces self-illumination in that manner.</p>
<p>The flare fuze is set by inserting it in the fuze setter installed on the port side of the ammo ready service locker.  Rotate the round so the fuze is set to the desired time delay, pull the pin and then fire it.  One favorite &#8220;ship handling&#8221; training exercise was to try to land the burned-out flare parachute on the deck by chasing it and manovering under it.  Pretty tricky.  <em>Photo: Tim Sammons</em></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/81mm-flare-shot.pdf-pages1.jpg" alt="" width="641" height="518" /></p>
<p>Below is photo sequence from another day firing the 81 mm.  In this case, note that the loader had dropped the round and is protecting himself from the blast.  In the second photo the round has fired and the barrel has recoiled about 6 inches backward relative to the recoil cylinder; the round is likely still inside the barrel making its way out when the photo was taken.   Note the muzzle flash hider mounted on the .50 Cal M2 barrel  <em>Photos:  Tim Sammons</em></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="Firing the 81 mm mortar" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/81mm-firing_NEW.jpg" alt="" width="857" height="602" /></p>
<p><em><br />
</em></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="81mm Mortar in full recoil" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/81Recoil1.jpg" alt="" width="860" height="601" /></p>
<p>Below is a view of the 40 mm gun being fired. There is a lot going on in this photo.  EM1 &#8220;Mac&#8221; is the Trainer, slewing the mount in azimuth.  The Pointer is on the other side of the gun and he sets the elevation of the gun.  He also fires the Gun with the foot trigger.  GMG2 (SEAL) &#8220;Bob&#8221; is the Loader as he prepares to load another 4 round clip into the feeder where 8 already reside waiting to be fired.  Note that the Ensign has been tied off to prevent if from slapping the Loader in the wind.</p>
<p>The particular round being fired is the HE-I-T/SD (High Explosive Incendiary Tracer/Self Destruct variant.  It has a maximum range of 6 nautical miles but the maximum effective range is much shorter.  This round would self detonate at 4000-5000 yards if it didn&#8217;t hit anything first &#8211; but it still had a point-detonation fuze.  The intent in anti-aircraft service was to put out a wall of high velocity shrapnel at that range that an enemy aircraft had to fly through.  It also reduced the friendly fire potential, a serious consideration in large fleet formations under air attack.  When fired, you could see the tracer all the way out and when you hit that 55 gallon drum, a bright flash and puff of gray smoke indicated detonation.  It was also a good training round due to this &#8220;self limiting&#8221; maximum range.  The Gun fires more than 2 rounds per second and is technically a &#8220;machine cannon&#8221;, being fully automatic.   Boom boom boom boom boom boom boom boom &#8230;Serious weapon.</p>
<p>Often called a &#8220;Bofors&#8221; Gun it is actually a US-manufactured weapon built by Chrysler Corporation, one of about 60, 000 they made during WWII.  We redesigned it under license from Bofors (Sweden) to eliminate the numerous hand fitted, gun-specific parts that Bofors was utilizing.  &#8220;File this part to fit upon final assembly&#8221;.  This did not lend itself to mass production or field repair parts logistics, so some redesign was made.  It was also redesigned for SAE &#8220;English&#8221; tooling versus the metric dimensioning in the original Swedish design. Approximately 26 nations used this gun or close variants.  It is still in use today &#8211; including on the AC-130 Spectre Gunships.</p>
<p>This particular gun aboard PTF-17 was a replacement, recently arrived from the Naval Ammunition Depot, Crane Indiana.  It was still in its Haze Gray paint and was apparently someone&#8217;s Mount 212 as indicated by the stencil on the elevation spring housing.  <em>Photo:  Tim Sammons</em></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="PTF  40 mm Gunnery Exericse" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/40-mm-Gunnery.pdf-pages1.jpg" alt="" width="710" height="577" /></p>
<p><strong>Fun Fact</strong>: When we received the boats at CRD21 the pointer and trainer foot rests had wooden blocks installed to better fit the shorter-statured Vietnamese.  This included a wooden block on the trigger pedal.  The bridge decking was also built up with nicely varnished wooded &#8220;hatch cover&#8221; plates to allow the RVN sailors to see over the dashboard.</p>
<p><strong>FIREPOWER</strong>:  We carried approximately 20 M-16 Rifles, four .45 cal pistols, two .38 cal pistols, two M-60 machine guns, two M-79 grenade launchers, two M-870 12 gauge shotguns, a 40 mm Very pistol, a .45/70 line-throwing gun plus the .50 cal M2, two 20 mm cannons, the 40 mm cannon and the 81 mm mortar.  Without a doubt, the most heavily armed vessel of its size anywhere.  Here&#8217;s some more photos of a typical day at work.  <em>Photo:  Tim sammons</em></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="M-16 practice" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/M-16-Practice.jpg" alt="" width="898" height="624" /></p>
<p>The 20 mm guns were a bit of an enigma to me.  When we received the boats from Vietnam, they had the Oerlikon 20 mm guns of WWII vintage.  They were mounted on deck on either side of the bridge.  This gun utilized the 60 round drum-type magazine and a reasonable photo of one is in the photo of Admiral Kauffman aboard PTF-17 on the CRD21 Ops posting.  For some reason I don&#8217;t think we ever fired them, at least on PTF-17 or PTF-18 while I was aboard.  It could be because we didn&#8217;t have any of the Gunners Mates with current &#8220;service record&#8221; school qualifications on them and even though the Navy&#8217;s Gunners Mate Class &#8220;A&#8221; School was at Great Lakes we may not have been qualified on them. They may have stopped teaching them at some point.</p>
<p>Some time during my tour we replaced the Oerlikons with the MK-16 belt-fed 20 mm guns.  I remember having to modify the two armor plates from the Oerlikon mount to accommodate the MK-16&#8242;s.  That required drilling new bracket holes in the plates and we must have worn out about a dozen drill bits trying to penetrate that armor plate.  Tough stuff!  Below is a photo of GMG2 &#8220;Jack&#8221; with the new MK-16 gun mount aboard PTF-18.  <em>Photo:  Tim Sammons</em></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="MK-16 20 mm Gun" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/MK-16Gun_NEW.jpg" alt="" width="611" height="413" /></p>
<p>While I was on active duty I don&#8217;t recall ever firing the MK-16&#8242;s either.  Maybe CRD21 did after I left active duty and joined the Reserve crew in August 1975 but I don&#8217;t recall it.  I have a vague memory of someone telling me that a 20 mm round detonated inside a gun, bird-caging the barrel.  If that actually happened, maybe we became &#8220;gun shy&#8221; or were directed not to fire them again.  Vague recollections:  Any CRD21 guys recall the situation with either of these guns?</p>
<p>M-60 Practice.  We usually mounted the M-60&#8242;s in the searchlight pintles on either side of the bridge, over the 20 mm gun mounts.  There was a cutout with a removable plywood cover in the decking for the lookouts / gunners and it was well positioned.  The M-60 could be fired single-shot; it had a flat trajectory and was VERY accurate.  Note the 81 mm mortar fuze setter on the ammo box (dark circle). Note the lamp assembly above the fuze opening to facilitate fuze setting in the dark.   <em>Photo:  Tim Sammons</em><br />
<img class="alignleft" title="M-60 Practice" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/M-60-Practice.jpg" alt="" width="888" height="619" /></p>
<p>Below: The Browning M2 .50 Cal heavy machine gun.  Another serious weapon.  After a healthy burst, the crew would light their cigarettes on the hot barrel.  If a round was still chambered after you had fired a burst, that round would eventually &#8220;cook off&#8221; from the heat retained in the chamber &#8211; very dangerous &#8211; keep the gun pointed down range at all times.  NEVER walk in front of it!  On rare occasions, a .50 cal round would hit a wave face at such an angle that it would come straight back at us.  Weird. How could that happen?  It sounded like a 10 pound bumble bee whizzing over your head.  Never got any dings in personnel or the boat but it was scary when it happened. <em> </em>Note the lack of hearing protection &#8211; this was the &#8220;Old Navy&#8221;, not good&#8230;<br />
Although not evident in this faded photo, the .50 Cal ammo projectiles were color coded.  We usually fired a mix including &#8211; Armor Piercing, Incendiary, Tracer.  This was a repeating, 5 round sequence consisting of those 3 types plus 2 Ball rounds.  Bad news for bad guys&#8230;<br />
<em>Photo: Tim Sammons</em><br />
<img class="alignleft" title="M2 .50 Cal Machine Gun" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/M2-.50-Cal.jpg" alt="" width="890" height="617" /><br />
Don&#8217;t forget the pre-firing set up of the M2 using your handy Head Space and Timing gauge &#8211; to prevent the gun from blowing up in your face.  Also, never charge the weapon by grabbing the handle with your palm facing forward &#8211; a cooked off round will drive the handle rearward, shattering your wrist.  Keep that palm facing you!</p>
<p>Below:  Loading and Firing the 40 mm with ammo made in 1944.  <em>Photo: Tim Sammons</em></p>
<p><strong>Fun Fact</strong>: When the projectiles you see below detonated, they sprinkled fragments of steel across the bottom of Lake Michigan.  Then they rusted, becoming iron ore.  During the first half of the 20th century much of the iron ore (steel) used in the US armaments buildup to fight WWII came from the Mesabi Iron Range, not far from here in Minnesota and extending out into Lake Superior and into the Upper Peninsula of Michigan and Wisconsin.  The worlds largest iron deposits.  The 40 mm rounds you see here were manufactured in 1944. In a real sense, that iron was &#8220;going home&#8221;.</p>
<p><em> </em><br />
<img class="alignleft" title="Firing the 40 mm underway" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/40-mm-Loading.jpg" alt="" width="900" height="622" /></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="Target Destroyed" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/Target-Destroyed.jpg" alt="" width="634" height="902" /><br />
<strong>We were AWESOME !!</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.n6cc.com/ptf-gunnery/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coastal River Division 21 / Ops</title>
		<link>http://www.n6cc.com/coastal-river-division-21</link>
		<comments>http://www.n6cc.com/coastal-river-division-21#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 23:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fast Patrol Torpedo Boats - PTF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n6cc.com/?p=624</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 16 June, 1973, CRD21 was Commissioned at the Great Lakes Naval Base near Chicago as the US Navy began to turn its attention to NATO operations in Europe.  CRD21 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On 16 June, 1973, CRD21 was Commissioned at the Great Lakes Naval Base near Chicago as the US Navy began to turn its attention to NATO operations in Europe.  CRD21 was initially equipped with PTF-17, 18 and 19 as they redeployed from Vietnam, and later with Patrol Gunboats Asheville, Crockett and Marathon, PG-84, 88 and 89 as they redeployed in from West Pac.  <em>We also had our own SEAL Team&#8230;</em></p>
<p>CRD21 was an element of Coastal River Squadron Two based at Little Creek VA.  They, in turn were an element of Naval Inshore Warfare Command Atlantic which also owned the SEAL&#8217;s, the Inshore Undersea Warfare Group and the Explosive Ordnance Disposal units of the Amphibious Forces, US Atlantic Fleet.  The Coastal River Divisions were eventually renamed Special Boat Units that morphed into today&#8217;s units still supporting Naval Special Warfare.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/NIWL.jpg" alt="" width="181" height="175" /></p>
<p>CRD21 was Commissioned to perform the following missions. &#8220;<em>To maintain craft to support coastal surveillance operations; develop small boat tactics; train personnel in the operation and maintenance of coastal craft in cold weather; conduct and support special warfare and naval inshore warfare operations; conduct and support special psychological and tactical cover and deception operations; and train selected reserve component to support these tasks in the event of mobilization</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>Most of the reservists and active duty crews were Vietnam Vets themselves, many with combat craft experience so it provided for a ready-made, strong team.  That included LCDR James Roper and LCDR Tim Johnston, our only two commanding officers and Division Commodores.  Great Lakes was selected as a base since it provided the only US cold weather training locale to prepare for NATO operations, one of our principal mission areas.  It also had a large population of Navy veterans in the reserve.</p>
<p><strong>Note:</strong> Readers are also directed to the excellent narratives of CRD21 written by LCDR Tim Johnston (CRD21 Commodore) and Master Chief Gunners Mate Bob Stoner.  Bob served with CRD21 during much  of the time I did and his carefully researched history can be found in Reference (10),  WWW.PTFNASTY.COM the excellent website by Dan Withers.  Bob covers  the history, personnel and some of the Navy&#8217;s politics in play during  that era.  He also specifically describes the PTF weapons systems as we  used them.    Commodore Johnston covered the command relationships, navy politics, unit history, overall viewpoints and The Big Picture that only the Division Commodore could have known.<strong> Bravo Zulu !</strong></p>
<p>To add to that body of information, I will attempt to fill  in details  on CRD21 and the PTF&#8217;s from an operational perspective.  I&#8217;ll get to training operations at Great Lakes and also  describe the boats&#8217; other specific systems in more detail.  There doesn&#8217;t seem to be much information on those boat-unique systems to be found on the Web since this all happened well before the Internet Generation was even born.  So I will try to fill in what I remember from 38 years ago.</p>
<p><strong>Training Operations at CRD21</strong>:</p>
<p>Below:  A typical day at the Office.  PTF-17, probably above 40 knots.  <em>Photo:  Tim Sammons</em></p>
<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 855px"><img title="Typical day at the office" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/PTF-at-speed_NEW.jpg" alt="" width="845" height="566" /><p class="wp-caption-text">PTF-17:  A typical day at the office....</p></div>
<p>First, the Op Area.  Lake Michigan was our primary Op area since the  Naval Base was near the south end of the lake.  For a lake, its pretty  big – you could go 40 knots in a straight line for almost 7 hours  without ever seeing land. The deepest areas of Lake Michigan were over 900 feet deep; the bottom being about 400 feet BELOW sea level.  We also made trips to the other Great Lakes  (except Ontario) for port visits and recruiting support.</p>
<p>I had a good friend  who was a Supply Officer at Navy Recruiting Command Region 5  and they  would pay for our fuel if we would stop at various cities around the  lakes and wave the flag.  We would meet the recruiters and take their prospects out for  rides.  I swore-in many future sailors on these trips.</p>
<p>Interestingly, we were not the first US Navy PT boats on the Great Lakes.  In October, 1945 seven Elco PT boats made their way from Newport Rhode Island to Detroit via the New York barge canals and the Welland Canal around Niagara Falls.  They sailed across Lake Erie for a &#8220;show the flag&#8221; visit to Detroit at the end of World War II.  (Reference 24)</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a new recruit being sworn-in at Fairport Harbor Ohio in July 1974.  Also a good shot of our new Mk 16 Belt-fed 20 mm automatic cannon.  (Pay no attention to that wolf howling at the moon &#8211; he&#8217;s not looking at YOU).   <em>Official US Navy Photograph<br />
</em><br />
<img class="alignleft" title="New Recruit Fairport Harbor Ohio, July 1974" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/Recruiting_NEW.jpg" alt="" width="684" height="518" /></p>
<p><strong>Fun Fact</strong>:  Somehow the Army had good Intel on our schedule (we sure didn&#8217;t!) .   At a few  stops, ARMY recruiters were there ahead of the Navy guys to tell future Army recruits  about  the cool Green Boats that the ARMY had!  &#8220;Join the ARMY &#8211; See the World&#8221; !!  Well, we are all on the  same  side&#8230;. Good for them!</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a cool shot of PTF-19 idling during the annual Chicago Air and Water Festival on the Chicago waterfront.  We made several high speed runs past the reviewing stand and then stood out while the US Army Golden Knights parachute team flew by in their vintage C-47 with its snazzy paint job.    Apparently the National Anthem was being played at the time.   The US Navy Blue Angels also flew and we got to take their pilots for a PTF ride afterwards.<em> Official US Navy Photograph</em></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="PTF-19 and the US Army Golden Knights C-47" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/C-47-PTF.pdf-pages.jpg" alt="" width="598" height="484" /></p>
<p><strong><br />
</strong><br />
<strong>Fun fact</strong>:  The USMC flew an early-version  Harrier to the show, roaring in from the east and slowly stopping to hover over the lake in front of the grandstand on Lakeshore Drive.  Jet blast downwash spray completely soaked a few thousand spectators &#8211; most of them probably loved it.</p>
<p>Below is a shot taken during our recruiting trip to Chicago.  We were tied up forward of the USS Silversides SS-236, a famous WWII Fleet Submarine which was tied up at the Chicago Naval Pier.  During her Pacific patrols, Silversides sank 23 enemy ships and damaged another 14 earning her the third highest total of any US submarine.  The Silversides is now apparently moored at Muskegon, Michigan educating our citizens about the realities of WWII.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="USS Silversides" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/USS-Silversides_NEW.jpg" alt="" width="697" height="577" /></p>
<p>Most of our training, and all of our gunnery training was on Lake  Michigan. I was told that the treaty that ended the War of 1812  stipulated the numbers and sizes of guns the US and Canada were  permitted to arm vessels with on the Great Lakes.  Apparently the State  Department had to work a deal with Canada to waive that treaty so we  could operate and shoot on the lakes.  There were 2 gunnery training  areas, one in the south-central part of the lake, maybe 20×40 miles and  another further north which was bigger.  I understand that the Fox  Island group at the north end of Lake Michigan had been used in WWII and  later with the USS Parle reserve DE as gunnery targets.  We never shot  that far north.  We were told that the “flower children” of the day were  enraged that the Navy was ruining the vegetation on these islands with  the gunnery.  Until someone noticed that the target islands were much  more heavily vegetated than the others – nitrates in explosives make  great fertilizer.</p>
<p>We did many beach reconnisance exercises along the shores, notably  across at Muskegon, Traverse City, and beaches in northern Illinois and  Wisconsin and down to Gary Indianna (where we would be out-gunned by the  civilian population found there….)</p>
<p>When I was a kid, I grew up watching the television series<em> Navy Log</em> about WWII in the Pacific.  One episode was  called “A Bucket of Sand”  where a UDT team was sent ashore on some enemy  controlled island in the Pacific to capture a canvas bucket of sand from the beach.   This was needed so the intel guys could assess the beaches&#8217; suitability for  amphibious landings and subsequent cross-beach vehicle ops.  Subtle, important stuff.  Seemed like  a perfect Op for us, so one night we snuck up on Illinios Beach State  Park and sent the SEALS ashore in their rubber IBS boat to capture a  bucket of sand.  Standard UDT/SEAL mission as part of beach recon and  surveys.  Fun, relevant.  Little did I know&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Speaking of Underwater Demolition Teams, I was honored to meet the founder of the Navy Combat Demolition Units and Navy Explosive Ordnance Disposal,  Rear Admiral Draper Kauffman.  Admiral Kauffman had an outstanding career, basically bringing British expertise in Explosive Ordnance Disposal to the US after having served in the UK as a volunteer during the German Blitz.   He defuzed the first live bomb found at Pearl Harbor (actually a 500 pound enemy bomb at the Schofield Barracks that had just missed the ammunition dump) after the attack, earning the Navy Cross.  Later, as the leader of UDT-5, he led a daylight beach reconnisance of Saipan while under heavy fire, earning his second Navy Cross.  He again led the UDT teams in the Tinian, Iwo Jima and Okinawa assaults.  If anyone in the world knew the true significance of a mere &#8220;Bucket of Sand&#8221;, it was him.</p>
<p>He went on the command destroyers, cruisers, the US Naval Academy and finally the Navy&#8217;s Ninth Naval District based at Great Lakes.  It was there that I got to meet him as he took a ride aboard PTF-17. Below. <em><em>Photo: Official US Navy Photograph</em>.</em></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="Admiral Kaufman" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/Admiral-Kaufman.pdf-pages.jpg" alt="" width="593" height="481" /></p>
<p>Below is another Official US Navy Photograph as Mayor Richard Daley of Chicago opened up all the bridges across the Chicago River as a salute to the Navy.  Apparently it snarled the early morning commute traffic so badly, it is still backed up.  A third PTF is in the far right background, behind and to the right of the small boats. <em>Photo:  Official US Navy Photograph</em></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="Chicago Bridges Salute" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/Bridges.pdf-pages.jpg" alt="" width="712" height="578" /></p>
<p>Below is another shot of Admiral Kauffman, Mayor Daley and Commodore Roper, Chicago River.  Fireboats A-Squirtin&#8217;. <em>Photo:  Official US Navy Photograph</em></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="Mayor Daley Chicago River" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/Mayor-Daley.pdf-pages1.jpg" alt="" width="713" height="578" /></p>
<p>Reserve Drill Weekends:  Since we had a large reserve crew at CRD21 and to best utilize the assets, we broke them up into a Blue and Gold crew.  That meant that we were underway 2 weekends per month as they did their monthly training.  We did a lot of gunnery training!  Lots!  We shot up a whole bunch of WWII vintage ammo and we were all impressed with its reliability.  Hardly ever a hang fire.  More to follow on that.</p>
<p>We generally followed “Fleet Exercise Publication” FXP-3, the Navy’s book of standard shipboard exercises.  It contained canned exercise scenarios to work each department and system on the boat from engineering, deck seamanship, gunnery, operations, damage control, communications etc.  A pretty common one was Z-29-G, an exercise to engage a floating enemy mine with gunfire.  Many 55 gallon drums were shredded as a result.  Another was Z-10-CC, surface tracking of contacts by radar.  We did precision anchoring, towing a “disabled” boat, man overboard, engineering casualty drills, fire and flooding drills, medical response, navigation and piloting, and many others.  Small boat, small, well-trained crew, good fun.  Everyone knew everyone else’s job pretty thoroughly.</p>
<p>Below is a shot of PTF-17 &#8220;coming at ya&#8221;.  <em>Photo:  Curt Froyen<br />
</em></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="PTF-17 Port Bow shot" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/PTF17PortBow-W.pdf-pages.jpg" alt="" width="590" height="320" /><br />
<strong>Patrol Gunboats</strong>:<br />
As stated earlier, the Patrol Gunboats USS Asheville (PG-84), USS Crockett (PG-88) and USS Marathon (PG-89) joined CRD21 sometime well after we were commissioned.  These guys had seen a lot in combat in Vietnam before they were redeployed elsewhere in WestPac.  They were assigned to CRD21 and for awhile, lived with us. They were tied up at our usual berths on the south side of the north quaywall as shown in the photo below.  (They were never moored on the other side of that quaywall as another blogger had posted &#8211; the water was very shallow there).  The PTF&#8217;s were moved to the south quaywall.  The PG&#8217;s needed the steam lines for moored heating which we didn&#8217;t and the water was deeper there as well.  The south quaywall was not good for the PTF&#8217;s.  A strong storm surge often built up in the harbor right there and the PTF&#8217;s were sometimes damaged against the fenders and pier.</p>
<p>In the winter (1974-75 I recall) when we were pulled for overhaul, they tried to stay at Great Lakes but there was a problem. Since they remained afloat and the harbor would freeze hard-over, their hulls needed protection.  So a system of weighted, perforated firehoses was installed by our SEALS on the bottom under their keels and filled with compressed air to generate a constant stream of bubbles.  This pulled warmer water (OK, it was cold, but still liquid!) up from the bottom, theoretically keeping the ice away from their hulls. They couldn&#8217;t turn over their engines/shafts periodically to keep things straight and loose and despite the fact that they had controllable-pitch screws there was fear they would churn up the hoses. (They could rotate at &#8220;zero pitch&#8221;, not causing thrust but rotating nonetheless.)  Worked. Sorta.</p>
<p>But not really, so they were sent down to the Chicago Naval Pier for a similar system that was better supported.  I understand that was a real problem between the City of Chicago and Navy Public Works at the naval facility down there, but somehow that&#8217;s where they remained.  These ships were real thoroughbreds and they needed a lot of TLC to remain operational.  With their diesel engines for 0-15 knots and a marine gas turbine for above 15 knots, they were a hybrid design with many complexities.</p>
<p>I only remember operating with them one time before I left active duty in August 75 and that was some simple surface tracking and &#8220;Div Ops&#8221;, no gunnery.  They seemed to be down for maintenance a lot and their active crews were reduced with the idea that the Reservists filled out the WQS Bill.  Fine in theory but all that maintenance had to be done when the Reservists were generally not aboard.  I only have a few photo&#8217;s of them, here&#8217;s one of the USS Asheville nested-out from one of the others.  Can anyone else add to this story?  <em>Photo:  Tim Sammons</em><br />
<img class="alignleft" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/PGs-at-Great-Lakes_NEW.jpg" alt="" width="878" height="622" /><br />
<strong>Fun &#8220;Fact&#8221;:</strong> The day Crockett and Asheville arrived, the Navy Band had mustered on the pier, everyone was there but there was a thick fog bank off the coast and visibility was about 100 feet.  They had anchored-out for the night waiting for the fog to clear for their 0800 arrival.  One of the PTF&#8217;s got underway to &#8220;investigate&#8221;.  Since we were supposed to be &#8220;competitive&#8221; with them for some reason, someone thought it be appropriate to greet them and show them how things worked around here.  The Sea Story goes that PTF-X  made a radar-controlled close pass down their starboard sides at 30 knots, pulling a water skier decked out in an orange kapok life jacket and M1 Helmet &#8211; on a 200 foot rope.   Outta the fog &#8211; zoom by &#8211; disappeared into the fog.  PT boat?  What PT boat? Water Ski&#8217;s??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.n6cc.com/coastal-river-division-21/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEAL Training Ops at Coastal River Division 21</title>
		<link>http://www.n6cc.com/seal-ops-at-crd21</link>
		<comments>http://www.n6cc.com/seal-ops-at-crd21#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 23:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fast Patrol Torpedo Boats - PTF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n6cc.com/?p=1298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coastal River Division 21 had a small SEAL detachment assigned to our Operations Department during its years at Great Lakes. Led by LT &#8220;Lee&#8221; and 4 &#8211; 5 senior enlisted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coastal River Division 21 had a small SEAL detachment assigned to our Operations Department during its years at Great Lakes.  Led by LT &#8220;Lee&#8221; and 4 &#8211; 5 senior enlisted SEALS, all recently back from the Teams in Vietnam.   Mike, Bob, Lenny, David&#8230;  LT &#8220;Lee&#8221; was an Mustang SEAL Officer, formerly an enlisted SEAL.  A more solid, experienced  guy you will never encounter.  His team of equally solid guys  occasionally filled billets on the PTF&#8217;s when we were shorthanded, notably as weapons trainers or gun crews.   As with all SEALS in those days, they carried a variety of Navy ratings but at the heart, they were SEALS.  This outfit at Great Lakes must have been a strange environment for them as they, and most of the crews transitioned to a peacetime training environment.</p>
<p>The NAVBASE had rules about uniforms that unfortunately applied to CRD21 as well.  The enlisted wore dungarees and the officers and chiefs wore khaki&#8217;s, not the green utilities worn by the rest of the Navy&#8217;s CRD units.  That also applied to the SEALS who much preferred their UDT shorts, blue &amp; golds and boots.  A source of much grumbling but as they told me: &#8220;You wear-a the name, you play-a the game&#8221;.  Incidentally, if you see any photo&#8217;s of PTF&#8217;s with the crew in Greens, it was not CRD21, if they were in dungarees, they most likely were CRD21.</p>
<p>Our SEALS&#8217; principal involvement was to train, assist and advise us on the CRD and PTF&#8217;s primary function of transporting, inserting, supporting and extracting SEALS on any number of types of missions.  I won&#8217;t say much about this except to say it was done mostly at night, hence few photo&#8217;s.  Those evolutions were often to move into a target area, launch them in their IBS (Inflatable Boat Small &#8211; Navy lingo) and then stand by to support them with gunfire if necessary.  Then move in, pick them up, leave rapidly and discourage anyone from following us.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a photo of the IBS with its small outboard motor which was used in situations where the PTF didn&#8217;t get too close inshore for a variety of reasons.  These boats were ideally suited for the SEALS missions.  Normally crewed by 3 men paddling on each side plus a coxswain in the rear.  Hence the origin of a 7 man SEAL squad.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="IBS with Motor" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/IBS-Motor.jpg" alt="" width="727" height="502" /></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a shot of the crew training for a night IBS launch.  The lifelines and stanchions were dropped and the boat readied for launch.  Seems simple enough on a calm day but required good crew coordination at night.  <em>Photo: Tim Sammons</em></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="IBS Launch Training" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/IBS-Launch.jpg" alt="" width="914" height="731" /></p>
<p>One notable evolution, not involving the PTF&#8217;s was a SEAL training Op on the Mississippi River, nominally as a SERE (Survival, Evasion, Resistance, Escape) class. I got to go along as a &#8220;trainee/observer&#8221; which I thought was great fun and a greater experience.  The &#8220;mission&#8221; was to infiltrate the AO, capture some enemy canoes at a location on the Turkey River in Iowa, paddle downstream out into the Mississippi and then go upstream for about 10 miles to Lock and Dam # 10 to simulate sabotaging it.  We were only allowed to carry a jungle hammock, knife, fish hooks and line, &#8220;living off the land&#8221;.  No cameras allowed, no photo&#8217;s. We hid out on islands and along the banks of the river by day &#8220;scavenging&#8221; for food.</p>
<p>This was Iowa farm country&#8230;.Corn on the cob, potatoes, apples, watercress, creek chubs, blue berries, strawberries, catfish, an unfortunate rattle snake (they DO taste like chicken) and even some watermelon left by boaters.  We built an in-ground meat/fish smoker to preserve the meat for storage and transport &#8211; worked great.  Lee knew the territory and what to eat, I gained 5 pounds during the 14 day &#8220;survival&#8221; trip&#8230;</p>
<p>We also learned to &#8220;cut enemy lines of communications&#8221;, capture vital enemy communications equipment and generally doing what SEALS did.  It ended with some rappelling training (I watched) on some big cliffs along the Mississippi.  (Hint:  Don&#8217;t rappell while wearing a Woolly-Pully&#8221;.) Then off to the &#8220;Cave&#8221; safe house to meet the local partisans and debrief.  If you were there, you know what all of this actually means&#8230;..   Good training, good fun.</p>
<p>To maintain their &#8220;Jump, Dive and Demo&#8221; proficiency pay they came up with many novel training evolutions.  In the diving arena they would infiltrate into the local golf course at night (dead of winter-no one around), cut a hole in the ice over the various water hazards and scuba dive for the treasure trove of golf balls therein.  They would also go out to Fox Lake in northern Illinios, the scene of winter-time motorcycle and snow mobile races on the (more-or-less) frozen lake.  They retrieved many snowmobiles or dirt bikes that managed to submerge after penetrating the ice.  They would also dive along the many fishing piers along the lake shore at night, pulling buckets full of fishing lures that had gotten snagged on the pilings.  Good practice for planting Limpet mines on that enemy warship.</p>
<p>The Command also sent them to Outboard Motor School in Waukegan (home of Johnson/Evinrude Outboards), off to lock picking school, diesel locomotive (sabotage) school with the Illinois Railroad and other interesting locales.  They also did parachute jumps and demolition refresher training with an Army Special Forces unit based at Fort Sheridan, near Chicago.</p>
<p>One of our SEALS, Petty Officer &#8220;Lenny&#8221;, would often lay down on a quay wall with his arm submerged in the water &#8211; for an hour or more at times.  Then &#8211; whoosh!  Out would come a big Coho salmon he caught by the gills with his bare hand&#8230;.I tried it &#8211; just ended up with wrinkled fingers&#8230;.&#8221;you had to communicate with the fish&#8217;s environment and gain his confidence properly&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>It turns out that this manner of fishing had many lessons.  The Objective was simple: Grilled salmon for dinner.  For a successful tactical mission you had to get inside the fish&#8217;s OODA Loop (Observe, Orient, Decide, Act).  You would use all the military arts of observation, recon, stealth, patience, timing, surprise and quick action to accomplish the mission &#8220;at hand&#8221;, and do it faster than the target could get inside YOUR OODA Loop.  Another day in the life of Freddie the Frogman&#8230;and a young Ensign.</p>
<p>One day, the Naval Training Center commander asked CRD21 to put on a &#8220;combat display&#8221;, probably for Family Day or other open house on the base.  So we concocted a mission along the waterfront where the RV park is currently located &#8211; in those days it was open beach / scrub.  NTC had set up some bleachers along the coastal road so visitors could watch.</p>
<p>The idea of this simulated night Op was a PTF would sneak in, heave to and launch the SEALS in the IBS who then paddled ashore.  There they planted some demolition on the &#8220;target&#8221; (an enemy missile launcher as I recall) and then withdrew.  Somehow the enemy found out before they blew the demo (half pound blocks of Composition B explosives)  so the PTF had to return fire as the SEALS paddled back out to the boat.  As part of the preparations for the &#8220;demo&#8221; (ahem), they planted many small blocks of Comp B around the beach to simulate our incoming mortar and 40 mm gunfire.  Cool.</p>
<p>So then they blew the main demo charge (electrically fired by a SEAL actually on the beach with the safety officer) and BOOM!  big explosion throwing up lots of sand then lots of smaller explosions simulating our mortar fire.   BOOM  BOOM  BABOOM BABOOM etc.  Lots of dust and flying shrubbery.   We were firing the .50 cal machine gun with blanks.  Enemy missile launcher destroyed,  all hands recovered, PTF roars off, the crowd cheered.</p>
<p><strong>Fun Fact:</strong> Later,  we got the &#8220;bill&#8221; for all the broken windows in the Fire Controlman Training Building up on top of the bluff.  OOPS!  Amazing what the shock wave caused by a few pounds of explosives can do, even at a distance.</p>
<p>If you read GMCM Bob Stoner&#8217;s account of life at CRD21 (highly recommended) he will tell of a certain Gunners Mate who incorrectly installed the Blank Firing Adapter on our .50 Cal machine gun.  Modified of course with the air-cooled aircraft barrels required for blank firing of an M2 .50 Cal. back in those days.  That BFA probably went sailing over the spectators heads, no one was the wiser except the .50 gunner who now had an unexplained stoppage.   It&#8217;s probably still buried in the bluff below FT &#8220;A&#8221; School.  Another day at the office&#8230;.</p>
<p>These guys were the &#8220;Old Navy&#8221; SEALS when the Teams were much smaller and tighter as compared with today&#8217;s large NSW community, so I&#8217;m told.   They had done everything imaginable during the war, didn&#8217;t talk about it much but you knew they knew their business.  I learned a lot from all of them and Lt &#8220;Lee&#8221; was a great mentor of mine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.n6cc.com/seal-ops-at-crd21/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AN/GRC-109 &#8220;Special Forces&#8221; Radio Set</title>
		<link>http://www.n6cc.com/angrc-109-special-forces-radio-set</link>
		<comments>http://www.n6cc.com/angrc-109-special-forces-radio-set#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2011 03:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military Tactical Radios]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n6cc.com/?p=123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Probably my favorite radio set.  The &#8220;COOL METER&#8221; is Pegged on this one! Used extensively from the early 1960&#8242;s through the 1970&#8242;s and beyond by US military Special Forces worldwide, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably my favorite radio set.  The &#8220;COOL METER&#8221; is Pegged on this one! Used extensively from the early 1960&#8242;s through the 1970&#8242;s and beyond by US military Special Forces worldwide, including  SF &#8220;A&#8221; Teams, ARVN units operating inside North Vietnam, Navy PTF boats and others in Vietnam, it did the job well.  Extremely rugged and designed for lengthy burial in the ground as part of an equipment cache, these radios have a Cool Factor 36.6 db higher than any plastic RiceBox ever made by KenYaeIc.  They were, and are extremely reliable, fun and quite EMP-proof.  GRC-109&#8242;s will be operational LOOOONG after those custom LCD displays and proprietary microscopic microprocessors flame out in all those modern RiceBox appliances.  Not to mention those modern, Mil-Spec software defined rigs&#8230;.</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 431px"><img src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/grc109_man.jpg" alt="" width="421" height="320" /><p class="wp-caption-text">From the GRC-109 manual:    Just makes you want to be there!</p></div>
<p>Listen in !</p>
<p>AR</p>
<p>Designed as an &#8220;Armyfied&#8221; version of the CIA&#8217;s previous RS-1 radio set which had been in widespread use in the 1950&#8242;s.  They are very similar in appearance and operation.  The Army adopted it (circa 1962) with minor modifications as the AN/GRC-109 to be supportable with standardized training, repair parts and depot maintenance within the Army supply  and logistics system.</p>
<p>With a transmitter  output of around 10 watts, a built in key that works well, versatile  power supply and a sensitive receiver, they did the job.  In approximately 1969 the Army introduced the AN/GRC-109A, basically the same radio system however the A model had substantially thicker and stronger cases and it included a quick-remove cover with snap closures versus the screw-down types of the basic 109.  The 109A also included the connector for the GRA-71 burst keyer; apparently most or all of the previous 109&#8242;s were subsequently modified for this as well.</p>
<p>Below is the CIA&#8217;s RT-3, the transmitter of the RS-1 system.  Almost identical to the GRC-109 transmitter (T-784/GRC-109 as described above) but note the absence of the connector for the GRA-71 Code Burst Keyer and a different arrangement of the CW key and receive antenna connector posts.   No other &#8220;US&#8221; markings &#8211; I bet that fooled &#8216;em !</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 650px"><img title="RT-3 Transmitter from RS-1 System" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/RT-3-Transmitter-010.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="480" /><p class="wp-caption-text">RT-3 Transmitter from RS-1 System</p></div>
<p>Reference (3) describes the use of the GRC-109 by US Army Special Forces in Vietnam.  It states that the GRC-109 apparently was not issued to conventional Line units in that era.  Other references state otherwise.   In those days, typical Line units depended upon easy-to-operate voice radio systems they had available, especially as the CW skills of many RTO&#8217;s atrophied along the way.  The 109&#8242;s were deployed at SF camps and in fortified villages throughout the country as the only means of reliable comms back to HQ in Saigon and between themselves for mutual support.</p>
<p>The GRC-109 / RS-1 was also used by Special Forces world-wide in the 1950&#8242;s &#8211; 60&#8242;s and likely beyond.  I have seen a BA-48 battery (also used with the GRC-9) with a date code of May, 1984 although it&#8217;s possible it was made under a foreign sales contract to support these radios being used by our allies. &#8211; Or not -</p>
<p>Apparently they were reliable and quite successful in the Special Forces networks in Vietnam.  Due to their simplicity and all-weather ruggedness, I would assume they were more reliable than the FRC-93 (Collins KWM-2) that SF was beginning to deploy at SF camps.   Especially when you consider that the FRC-93 required AC power and associated generator not to mention the serious environmental protection.  The GRC-109 could use AC or the hand cranked generator thus increasing its dependability in a combat environment.  They were installed in the &#8220;commo bunkers&#8221; as a basic means of protection and operational security, however when under attack the VC and NVA were good at spotting antennas.  The reference states that as a countermeasure the wire antennas were put inside bamboo &#8220;pipes&#8221; and buried 18 inches underground &#8211; and were still effective in communicating.  It&#8217;s an authoritative reference but I will take it for face value, no mention of freq or operating range was noted.  That&#8217;s an experiment I will try to duplicate this summer and see for myself.  I&#8217;m a bit skeptical, especially during the &#8220;wet&#8221; season there.  I have made contacts with mine using only a 1/4 wave wire laying on the ground &#8211; that works OK &#8211; but that&#8217;s a different story.</p>
<p>My GRC-109 field kit below:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/Pigout-June-08-023.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="480" /></p>
<p><img src="file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/COMPAQ%7E1/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-4.png" alt="" /></p>
<p>Powered by 70-270 VAC, an optional UGP-12 gas fueled generator, 6 VDC from that  captured Zil truck battery or a G-43 hand cranked generator, they could  be used anywhere.  The receiver could also be powered by itself from a BA-48 battery for those long watches on the Alert Net.  Environmentally tough, they can withstand and operate in lousy weather.  Plugged into an electric lamp socket in that hotel &#8220;safe house&#8221;  via a screw-in adapter, their CW would not  even blink the house lights  during those 0242 hours  SITREP transmissions back to base.  It is capable of running the receiver with crystal control &#8211; that works very well but the variable tuning works better for casual Ham operation.  The TX of  course is crystal controlled.  Shown below running a coax-fed dipole for TX and a random RX wire launched into a nearby tree with a pine cone for a weight.</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 895px"><img class="   " src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/P1010036.jpg" alt="" width="885" height="664" /><p class="wp-caption-text">GRC-109 Operations in the Mountains  - N6CC</p></div>
<p>Below is a station on  the granite, up in the Sierras, tracking and  reporting suspicious canoeing  activity on Caples Lake in the  background.  The off-camera PU-181 rattling away  generating AC power and also  discouraging mosquitoes.  A great campsite radio when you are well beyond cell-phone or repeater coverage.  You can also use it  to get the  latest soccer scores from Radio Australia, coordinate your operations with a time-tick from  WWV or get a good laugh from Radio Havana Cuba, &#8220;Free Territory of the America&#8217;s&#8221; on the shortwave bands.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="GRC-109 at Caples Lake" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/CaplesRock1.jpg" alt="" width="914" height="571" /></p>
<p>The transmitter will load anything, much like the RS-6.  I have powered up dipoles, inverted &#8220;L&#8221;s,  random wires, a barbed wire fence, the rain gutters on the home QTH (stealth ops) etc.  As seen in these photos, the T-748/GRC-109 included a TX panel connector for a GRA-71 300 WPM burst keyer so you could send your SITREP with a lower probability of detection before you QRT&#8217;d and boogied.</p>
<p>The below photo is another favorite campsite further up into the mountains.  Set up next to my cot, it kept me in touch from a place not covered by VHF FM repeaters and probably 40 miles from the nearest cell phone coverage area. My buddies just shake their heads &#8211; but then ask me how to go about getting a Ham license&#8230;.</p>
<p>BTW, that &#8220;hot pink&#8221; object in the background is an Army Signal Corps VS-17 visual signal panel laying on the rocks.  They are used to mark friendly positions when working with Tactical Air or other friendlies in the area.  We were using it so that late arriving campers to the general area could locate our position exactly from their avenue of approach.  You can see these things in the bush from many miles away although this photo doesn&#8217;t seem to capture its brightness.  It must be stressing the color filters in my cheap digital camera!</p>
<p>In fact, it caught the attention of an F-5E Tiger II  jet pilot flying out of NAS Fallon Nevada.  He went overhead about 10,000 feet above us; it caught his eye so he banked and took a second look.  He knew something &#8220;military&#8221; was going on &#8211; civilians don&#8217;t usually pack and display these panels; he knew exactly what it was.    He made a wide, descending  turn and then roared directly overhead about 500 feet above us in a hard bank, standing on his wing to see what was going on.   We waved.  His F-5E was painted with Soviet camouflage markings and Red Stars &#8211; he was part of the &#8220;aggressor&#8221; training squadron at the Navy&#8217;s Top Gun school off to our east.</p>
<p>My buddies were bragging about how many fish they caught (I didn&#8217;t catch any as usual) but I caught an F-5E with MY lure !!</p>
<p>Come to think of it, I was running the GRC-109 at the time.  Maybe the J-STARS aircraft controlling the fight from a hundred miles away detected my CW signal and then got an HF DF fix on my position.  Maybe it wasn&#8217;t the panel&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>So we then waited for the &#8220;duty&#8221;  C-130 to parachute us a pallet of MRE&#8217;s, water, batteries and ammo but nothing showed up.  Well, an airstrike didn&#8217;t show up either so I guess we called it a draw.</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 698px"><img class="   " title="GRC-109 in the High Sierras" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/Tamarack-Lake-9-10-09-033.jpg" alt="" width="688" height="516" /><p class="wp-caption-text">GRC-109 in the High Sierras</p></div>
<p>The only apparent operational shortfall of the GRC-109 while used on Recon patrols was their weight, assisted by the heavy GN-58 or G-43 generator (the transmitter and receivers are relatively light).  Although substantially smaller, lighter and easier to pack than its predecessor GRC-9, it was still a bit heavy even though it was probably viewed as the latest state-of-the-art portable radio station at that time.  It would have been interesting to parachute with one of these strapped on (especially with the G-43 generator and seat) but that was apparently routinely done.  They were ultimately replaced by the PRC-74 or PRC-64 depending upon the unit/AOR, but their use continued on throughout the US military.  Clearly, they were heavily utilized by the CIA along with its predecessor, the RS-1.  One reference stated that they were routinely secreted inside the walls of selected apartment buildings in eastern Europe for use by stay-behind personnel in case the neighborhood went further downhill.</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 874px"><img class="  " src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/P9290593.jpg" alt="" width="864" height="648" /><p class="wp-caption-text">GRC-109 Suitcase Clandestine - N6CC</p></div>
<p>The above photo shows my veteran GRC-109 as it might have been stashed under the floor boards in the attic of Der Funkspiel Hotel, on the corner of Lenin Street and Karl Marx Way in Budapest.  This was just across the street from the Headquarters of the Soviet &#8220;Friends&#8221; T-54 Tank Regiment.  Circa 1956.  The brave Hungarians eventually won THAT battle.</p>
<p>Willing to bet there are many still in eastern Europe, southeast Asia or buried in various other interesting places worldwide.  Someone back at &#8220;HQ&#8221; still maintains the freqs/times/callsigns/one-time pads and Comm plan in case any of these sets are ever retrieved and activated by OPLAN XYZ.  Hope someone still knows morse code!  All the best agents do, of course&#8230;..I have no doubt that these covert rigs will fire right up when needed.</p>
<p>Below is my trusty &#8217;109 operating &#8220;tailgate portable&#8221;.  That big box of crystals sure makes life easier on the Ham Bands&#8230;  This particular setup runs the &#8220;small&#8221; AC power supply, PP-2685/GRC-109 which is powered by a 300 watt 120 VAC sine-wave inverter installed in the Bronco.  Clean, quite power.  The larger PP-2684 does everything the 2685 does but it can also be powered by a 6 VDC battery; it can also charge that battery.  For field ops requiring light transport, neither AC power supply is used.  In that configuration the GN-58 or G-43 hand cranked generator in conjunction with the CN-690/GRC-109 is used between the TX/RX and the generator.  The CN-690 contains an OB2 VR tube to regulate the RX B+ voltage &#8211; and is much lighter and smaller.  The receiver can also be directly powered by a BA-48 battery.<br />
<img class="alignleft" title="GRC-109 Tailgating Portable" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/Field-Day-6-06-011A.jpg" alt="" width="624" height="524" /></p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 788px"><img class="   " src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/P9290598.jpg" alt="" width="778" height="583" /><p class="wp-caption-text">GRC-109 DC-DC Converter powering receiver - N6CC</p></div>
<p>Above is a R-1004/GRC-109 Receiver being powered from a 12 Volt Gel Cell via a DC-DC Converter which solves the &#8220;continuous receive&#8221; power requirement when in the field.  Details on the Converter are in the Design and Engineering post elsewhere on this website.</p>
<p>My set came from Fair Radio.  It has obviously seen a lot of operational service, its pretty scuffed up but being indestructible, keeps on going.  None of the serial numbers match but some of the units have an interesting pale green lightning bolt stenciled on them.  Wonder who that was&#8230;.One strange problem they have is the receiver is starved for antenna signal when the antenna is routed through the transmitter during &#8220;key up&#8221;.  The key contacts short out the receiver signal to avoid overloading on transmit, but there is something lacking in the design &#8211; the only problem I have found.  I guess the TX output network loads the antenna circuit too much during key-up.  I&#8217;ll have to investigate.  As a result, I usually run mine with a dipole or inverted L on the transmitter and a random 50 &#8216; wire connected directly to the receiver.  Works great but takes a little more setup time.  The RS-6 set does not have this problem, but it uses a T/R relay to isolate things, the &#8217;109 does not have a relay.</p>
<p>The &#8220;GRC-109 A&#8221; model uses the &#8220;hasp&#8221; method for connecting the cast aluminum covers to the radio chassis.  Very strong but very heavy and it makes each chassis quite a bit bigger &#8211; I prefer the thumbscrew hold-downs of my plain &#8217;109 better.  They also fit inside an ALICE pack better.</p>
<p>A few &#8220;features&#8221; are noted.  The transmitter antenna output tuning  indicator is a #47 lamp across a 20 ohm resistor, this in series with  the output to the antenna connector.  This is really an RF current  monitor since it is in series.  With antennas with high impedance input,  there is little if any glow from this lamp although RF power is being  delivered to the antenna.  A 1/2 wavelength (or integer multiple) wire  is an example &#8211; it may seem like you can&#8217;t tune it.  To solve this, I  carry an NE-51 neon lamp with leads soldered to it; I then place this  from the antenna connector to ground, thus serving as an RF voltage  monitor since the transmitter is developing a high voltage in this  situation.  This will glow brightly with the above antenna since the  input to a 1/2 wave wire is high impedance.  I also use this trick on my  SCR-284 transmitter as well.  Handy.  With low impedance antennas (like  a dipole or a 1/4 wave wire) the installed #47 glows brightly when tuned.</p>
<p>In the receive department, the R-1004 does not have a AVC/AGC circuit  so you may have to ride the &#8220;Gain&#8221; control in the presence of strong  signals.  I have not found this to be a problem when operating up in the  mountains &#8211; few really strong signals to contend with (no locals !).   However, the set does not incorporate a means to generate a sidetone  signal so you can&#8217;t hear your own keying very effectively.  Since the receiver does not  effectively &#8220;mute&#8221; during key-down (the receiver antenna terminal is grounded via the CW key when using a common antenna), you can hear your own signal but it  seriously overloads the receiver.  Then, you must turn the Gain control  all the way to minimum to produce a usable sidetone.  A bit of an  annoyance if you are used to having KenYaeIc appliances do all the fun  stuff for you.  In typical military comms applications you would likely  be transmitting on Freq X while receiving on Freq Y, therefore loosing  the ability to monitor your own signal.  Takes some getting used to &#8211;  just &#8220;feeling&#8221; your fist via the key.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" title="GRC-109 system in the field - N6CC" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/P6020415.jpg" alt="" width="784" height="588" /><br />
<strong>Comm Center, Forward Operating Base (FOB) &#8220;PIGOUT&#8221;</strong><br />
Above is the basic field setup with the TX and RX powered by the &#8220;small&#8221; PP-2685 AC power supply and a gas-driven generator, the G-43 standing by.  TM 11-5820-474-14 (18MAY1962) indicates the use of the G-43 hand cranked generator.  However the G-43 is functionally interchangeable with the GN-58 and I am not sure when the change from the &#8217;58 to the &#8217;43 occurred.  Still looking for a reference on the GN-58 configuration.  We were running a coax-fed 40 meter dipole up about 15 feet with a separate 64 foot wire for the receiver.  Folding stool and big crystal collection optional while on operational missions.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" title="GRC-109 in action on 40 meters CW" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/P6020406.jpg" alt="" width="784" height="588" /><br />
Ditty-Bopping in the Mountains.  An effective, reliable radio.</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 753px"><img class="     " src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/CIMG3139.jpg" alt="" width="743" height="557" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Field Ops with the AN/GRC-109</p></div>
<p>Above is the same system in action, as used to work WA6OPE on 7050 KC at 2000Z, a 120 mile shot, human powered.  Good daytime signals with GRC-109 sets on <strong>BOTH ENDS</strong> of the contact.  Here we were running the set with the G-43 hand cranked generator and CN-690 Voltage Regulator module to power both the transmitter and receiver.  A pretty good workout (I&#8217;m told)!  Without a BA-48 battery just to power the receiver, the hand cranks must obviously be going for both transmit and receive &#8211; not recommended for casual operating&#8230;  So we compromised later on &#8211; ran the receiver off the PP-2685 on AC power for continuous tuning and the G-43 genny to power the TX only on this Op.  Cheating, but effective and easier on the non-Ham power source (who would rather be fishing&#8230;).</p>
<p>I had sent the above photo to Ray at Electric Radio Magazine for consideration in the &#8220;Electric Radio In Uniform&#8221; department.  I guess he liked it, he ran it in the Nov 2011 issue.  I guess he REALLY likes it &#8211; he ran it again (by mistake) in the April 2012 edition.  I guess some hams resonated with it &#8211; I have gotten some nice feedback on the &#8217;109 in the woods operations.</p>
<p>Below is the &#8217;109 at work in a different camp sending out the daily Fishing Report (got skunked AGAIN).  I was running it off the PU-181 generator (120VAC) at the time..  That generator is well suppressed &#8211; unlike my reliable but ignition-noise plagued Honda EX1000.  More on THAT piece of hardware later&#8230; The audio output of the GRC-109 receiver is 4000 ohms so an old pair of Hi-Z headphones with tip jacks works great.  I don&#8217;t have the issued-headphones just yet.  I often run it with a simple &#8220;amplified speaker&#8221; as seen here.  It&#8217;s from Radio Shack (horrors!) and is just a simple amp using a 486 amplifier IC driving a small speaker, the small white box seen here.  Works great when you don&#8217;t want to wear headphones.  Like public demo&#8217;s&#8230;.</p>
<p>Also, I like the built in key but I usually use the J-45 &#8220;leg iron&#8221; key as shown here &#8211; more comfortable for long CW sessions.  It appears that I was using separate wires for TX and RX.  After many years of working HF CW, I have found that almost any piece of wire you can get up in the air will work well, producing many contacts.  Dipoles have the highest performance/complexity ratio and are my usual favorites in the bush.  A pair of dipoles on 80/40, fed by a common coax works extremely well and is simple to get up.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="GRC-109 sending the Fishing Report" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/GRC-109-River.jpg" alt="" width="607" height="911" /></p>
<p>My camping buddies always prefer to arrive at the LZ a little late &#8211; helps them avoid big dents in their vehicles while I am slinging 8 ounce fishing weights up over the trees.  A source of great amusement for them but I have found nothing better than that simple expedient.  Easy work to put a dipole up to 100 feet high, but usually much lower.  I&#8217;ve become a pretty good shot with these.  I use the anchor line sold for duck decoys as the antenna halyards.  Lightweight, strong, stealthy.  Better than 550 parachute shroud line which is harder to launch and much more visible.  Wear gloves!</p>
<p>Again, much info on the Web regarding these radios so I will continue to focus on my experience with my set and its use in the field.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="GRC-109 in the Field" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/Vintage-Field-Day-Jun06-014.jpg" alt="" width="602" height="451" /></p>
<p>Above:  The GRC-109 in camp for Vintage Field Day.</p>
<p>Below is another shot of the GRC-109, this time paired with my Command Set operating on another Vintage Field Day from another riverside campsite. Fun radios.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="GRC-109 backing up the Command Set" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/Vintage-FD-Jun07-036.jpg" alt="" width="499" height="374" /></p>
<p>AR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.n6cc.com/angrc-109-special-forces-radio-set/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/Cuban-Intel-5800-KHz-2200-12-6-10.mp3" length="187719" type="audio/mpeg" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCR-284 Radio Set</title>
		<link>http://www.n6cc.com/scr-284-radio-set</link>
		<comments>http://www.n6cc.com/scr-284-radio-set#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 19:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military Tactical Radios]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n6cc.com/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The SCR-284 was used extensively during WWII.  Designed as a portable field radio, the complete field set could be carried by 3 men or it could be mounted in vehicles. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The SCR-284 was used extensively during WWII.  Designed as a portable field radio, the complete field set could be carried by 3 men or it could be mounted in vehicles.</p>
<p>I have had this one since I bought it in 1964.  It works quite well and has seen several field ops at various campsites.  It was NOS when I bought it.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/BC654-0151.jpg" alt="" width="576" height="432" /></p>
<p>Below: It is set up at a Stanislaus River campsite as my &#8220;night stand&#8221; so I can talk to the West Coast Military Radio Collectors net on 3985 KC on Saturday nights after I hit the rack (in the foreground).  I am still collecting the correct parts so that is a TBX key and an ersatz speaker.  I was running it from the PE-103 / PE-104 powered by a 12 volt deep cycle battery.  Looks like I had moved the dipole coax to a different radio.  It&#8217;s a pretty good &#8220;woods&#8221; radio and is very sensitive especially in a radio-quiet environment like this.  Sounds great.  That&#8217;s an NE-51 lamp wired across the antenna connector so I can tune up the transmitter in the dark &#8211; the RF meter is not illuminated and the radium/phosphor dial paint has long since faded out.</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 538px"><img class=" " title="SCR-284 at Campsite" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/SCR-284-CampSmall1.jpg" alt="" width="528" height="774" /><p class="wp-caption-text">SCR-284 set up at my &quot;night stand&quot; on the river - N6CC</p></div>
<p>Here is another setup at a different camp.  That whip mount fits the radio and MS &#8211; mast section perfectly but it is obviously different than the brown plastic mount usually seen. It is the originally supplied IN-106, a heavy, fragile part.  These were quickly replaced by the plastic IN-106A insulator which was much lighter and less fragile for field use.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="SCR-284 with whip" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/SCR284Whip.jpg" alt="" width="719" height="1079" /></p>
<p>Like most of my WWII radios (all?) this one still contains all but one of the original tubes.  I did replace a few capacitors and they are difficult to access in the receiver.  The most critical one was the AVC time-constant capacitor.  In that high impedance circuit a leaky capacitor can cause all kinds of gremlins to appear.   Change it out.</p>
<p><strong>Radioactivity</strong>: Incidentally, the meter in my SCR-284 is <em>relatively</em> &#8220;hot&#8221; radioactivity-wise.  More so than any other radio or meter I have.  Probably because there is a relatively large amount of paint on the scale.  It puts out about 6 mR/hour as measured with an Eberline E-120 Geiger counter (with detector probe HP-190A) contacting the meter glass.  Radium 226 is an Alpha emitter and it stays hot for a long time (half life of 1620 years as it decays into Radon gas).  It finally damaged the phosphor paint it was intended to excite in this meter.  Very, very dim glow these days.  <strong>Don&#8217;t</strong> disassemble it&#8230;This is most likely Gamma radiation &#8211; Alpha&#8217;s won&#8217;t penetrate the meter glass, nor will most Beta&#8217;s.  My R-390A Receiver meters also had detectable levels of radiation:  The Carrier Level meter read 1.2 mR/Hr, the Line meter read 0.4 mR/Hr.  Background during tests was 0.01 mR/Hr.  My TBY meter read 1 mR/Hr, my GRC-9&#8242;s labeling each read just background.  Probably no radium paint used on mine.</p>
<p>Below, a couple of shots of the SCR-284 &#8220;in the field&#8221;.  Merrills Marauders, 1944. Photos by Bernard Hoffman. Dim watermarks indicate these photo&#8217;s appeared in Life Magazine.</p>
<p>This first photo shows the whip antenna not installed in the IN-106 insulator.  Likely they were using a wire, probably an inverted &#8220;L&#8221; depending upon their tactical situation and availability of local supports.  Some wires are draped over the insulator leading off into the bush.  Note the absence of weapons except for the likely K-Bar knife worn by the helmeted soldier.  Also, there appears to be a PE-104 vibrator power supply under his right arm &#8211; this powers the SCR-284 receiver when using the hand-cranked generator.  Without it, you need to have a BA-43 battery &#8211; which is preferred.  Nice &#8211; if you can get one in Burma that still has any charge left in it.  Foliage looks like bamboo, probably in-theatre, Burma.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" title="SCR-284 in operation" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/1b2137ee48b827c8_large.jpg" alt="" width="855" height="878" /></p>
<p>In the below photo, the radio switches indicate it is on the Low Power, Voice mode.  The T-17 microphone is lying on the operating table.  In this case they appear to be using the whip antenna as the lead-in wire seems to be connected.  But I don&#8217;t see the ground wire for the counterpoise.  Maybe not always needed, a hassle to rig. This might be a company CP, working with SRC-536&#8242;s or up to another SCR-284 at Battalion level.  Merrills Marauders were usually resupplied by air; the photo may be depicting them coordinating an airdrop on their position</p>
<p><img class="alignnone" title="SCR-284 in the field" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/acda022e66f6866d_large.jpg" alt="" width="855" height="703" /><br />
Note the object behind the GN-45 generator in the above photo: Looks like a saddle from one of the &#8220;Motor Transport&#8221; units grazing nearby&#8230;Much better than humping this gear! .</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 874px"><img class="  " src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/P92305611.jpg" alt="" width="864" height="648" /><p class="wp-caption-text">SCR-284 at Batt Com Center  N6CC</p></div>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 360px"><img src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/SCR284Normandy.jpg" alt="" width="350" height="269" /><p class="wp-caption-text">SCR-284 at work: Normandy</p></div>
<p>Above:  Calling in Naval Gunfire with an SCR-284 from a shell hole in Normandy.  The soldier on the right is likely taking tactical calls-for-fires on his SCR-536, relaying from a nearby infantry unit.  Official US Army Photo</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.n6cc.com/scr-284-radio-set/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AN/GRC-9 Radio Set</title>
		<link>http://www.n6cc.com/angrc-9-radio-set</link>
		<comments>http://www.n6cc.com/angrc-9-radio-set#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 02:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Military Tactical Radios]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n6cc.com/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Updated:  US Marines of a Tactical Air Control Party with the First Marine Division in combat at the Chosin Reservoir operating a GRC-9 transmitter-receiver.  Note the weapon cleaning rod likely [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--[endif]-->Updated:  US Marines of a Tactical Air Control Party with the First Marine Division in combat at the Chosin Reservoir operating a GRC-9 transmitter-receiver.  Note the weapon cleaning rod likely being used for a ground rod.  GN-58 hand cranked generator, cold weather, possibly watching Marine Corps Corsairs rolling in on target:  NK or ChiCom troops danger-close.  Hopefully it got REAL HOT for the Reds in short order. Field day of the highest order, not fun.  But I bet it did the job&#8230;    The Marine holding the T-17 is likely a pilot from the supporting Marine fighter squadron. The Marines found that this type of assignment produced the best air-ground, close air support coordination possible.   Thanks guys.    <em>Official USMC Photograph.</em></p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="USMC Tactical Air Control Party - GRC-9" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/KoreaGRC9-0031.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="480" /></p>
<p>Later on<em>&#8230;&#8230;&#8221;With voice transmissions ruled out by distances, communications specialists must rely on continuous wave radio operation, using the International Morse Code.  They must be able to receive and transmit at the rate of 18 words per minute, perform maintenance up to Third Echelon and even build a working set out of parts at hand.  Other team members must be able to work at least five words per minute and know how to set up and operate a radio.  Workhorse of the Special Forces is still the dependable Angry Nine, officially the AN/GRC-9.&#8221;</em> Special Warfare U.S. Army, Chief of Information, U.S. Army 1962.</p>
<p>Below is my &#8220;GRC-9&#8243; set up on the Pacific beach at Spooner Cove near San Luis Obispo CA during less stressful times.  (Actually, it is a GRC-87 &#8211; do you know the difference?)  We were running &#8220;Coastwatcher Ops&#8221; and transmitting Bikini Reports back to a TCS set at Camp San Luis Obispo acting as Net Control.  This was during the Military Radio Collectors Group meeting in May 2010.</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 650px"><img src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/MRCG-5-10-0063.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="480" /><p class="wp-caption-text">AN/GRC-87 on the Beach.  N6CC</p></div>
<p>The distance from here to KG6UTS at Camp SLO NECOS was 9.2  Miles over hilly, rocky terrain.  From here to N6IHU was 3.3  miles and N6IHU to Camp SLO was 5.8 miles.   N6IHU was running another GRC-9 in a portable configuration however he was using the DY-88 Dynamotor power supply.  Under the conditions at that time (appx 1000 hours local) the signal  to noise ratio of received signals was 2 to 3 times better on the whip than  the AT-101 wire which surprised us.  It was running approximately northwest, broadside to  Camp SLO, averaging about 6 feet off the sand.  Comms with the 15&#8242; whip  antenna were Q5.  I didn&#8217;t note the FoF2 critical freq at that time to see if the low wire would work in NVIS mode under those conditions.  Apparently it was lower than our 3885 freq and/or the D Layer absorbtion was very high then.  We ran the standard ground counterpoise, G-43 hand cranked generator and a battery for the receiver to save the &#8220;power supply&#8221;.  The TCS was running a 30 foot inverted L and N6IHU was running the standard whip antenna.  This setup would have been a very workable tactical circuit.  <em>Photo: Tim Sammons<br />
</em></p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 870px"><img class="  " src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/MRCG-5-10-0021.jpg" alt="" width="860" height="645" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Coastwatcher Ops Pacific:  GRC-87   N6CC</p></div>
<p>Below is a typical mountain top campsite to cover all circuits.  There is the GRC-109, GRC-9, PRC-47 and the mobile GRC-9 all on-line.  However, looks like the flash caught the Midwatch off guard.  Zzzzzzzz.  Good thing the Sergeant wasn&#8217;t around!<br />
<img class="alignleft" title="Company Command Post Midwatch" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/Comm-Center-Night-Watch_NEW.jpg" alt="" width="631" height="425" /></p>
<p>Below is a shot of our Perimeter Defense Force checking out the Company Command Post.  Note the GRC-9 AC Power Supply built in the .50 Cal Ammo Box on the ground.  Provides all voltages from 120 VAC.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="Perimeter Defense Team Commo Watch" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/Pigout-May-2009-048.jpg" alt="" width="576" height="432" /></p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 599px"><img class="  " src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/QSL-Pampanito_NEW.jpg" alt="" width="589" height="368" /><p class="wp-caption-text">QSL Card; USS Pampanito SS-383  NJ6VT</p></div>
<p>Above:  QSL Card from the USS Pampanito SS-383, moored in San Francisco near the Golden Gate bridge.  I worked their ham station, NJ6VT aboard the sub on CW with my GRC-9 from our Forward Operating Base in the Sierra Nevada mountains.  Her wartime Navy call sign was NJVT.</p>
<p>Below is another shot of the GRC-9 in the field using the 50 caliber AC power supply.  &#8220;You have a strange rushing sound in your Transmit audio&#8221;&#8230;.Yup&#8230;.<br />
<img class="alignleft" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/Pigout-May-2009-0582.jpg" alt="" width="730" height="507" /></p>
<p>Below is another shot while sending Ditties from FOB (Forward Operating Base) Margarita&#8230;.The little AC power supply in the .50 Cal ammo can makes it convenient to work in camp.  Especially when you bring the generator to run the Blender anyway!<br />
.<img class="alignleft" title="GRC-9 sending &quot;river traffic&quot;" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/Pigout-May-2009-056.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="480" /></p>
<p>Would you believe a solar-powered GRC-9?  Been there, done that.  Here we are set up in the mountains west of Lake Tahoe at OP COMMANDO, monitoring kayak traffic 2000 feet below us on the North Fork of the American River.  Panel charged the deep cycle battery which powered the sine wave inverter that powered the ammo box power supply which powered the GRC-9.  Inefficient as hell but it worked!</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="Solar-powered GRC-9" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/Vintage-FD-808-040.jpg" alt="" width="737" height="553" /></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s another shot of that position &#8211; we also had a PRC-47  going on CW and LSB as well. There is the wreckage of a C-46 Commando somewhere within a mile of this location.  Very dense forest in here.  It&#8217;s on our list for a search expedition.  This spot will make for a very good base camp.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="American River OP" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/Vintage-FD-808-029.jpg" alt="" width="582" height="437" /></p>
<p>Below is the GRC-9 at work down in the Commo Bunker sending out the nightly SITREP at Zero Dark Thirty</p>
<div class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 727px"><img class="   " src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/PB270780.jpg" alt="" width="717" height="538" /><p class="wp-caption-text">GRC-9 at work in the Commo Bunker</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.n6cc.com/angrc-9-radio-set/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Canteen&#8221; Shortwave Radio Receiver</title>
		<link>http://www.n6cc.com/canteen-radio-receiver</link>
		<comments>http://www.n6cc.com/canteen-radio-receiver#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2011 21:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Design and Engineering Projects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.n6cc.com/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One recent project was building a replica of the &#8220;canteen radio&#8221; that was used by US Army personnel in the Japanese POW camp at Cabanatuan in the Philippines during WWII.  [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One recent project was building a replica of the &#8220;canteen radio&#8221; that was used by US Army personnel in the Japanese POW camp at Cabanatuan in the Philippines during WWII.  Its layout follows a description and drawing published in the <em>Reference (5): US Army in WWII, The Technical Services, The Signal Corps: The Outcome pp 274-275</em>.  This prototype is very sensitive &#8211; using a 6SK7 or 12SK7 it can receive many foreign shortwave broadcasts from about 3.8 &#8211; 7.5 MC, using a 50 foot wire antenna.  Their antenna was woven inside a clothesline.   The radio escaped discovery by the Japanese guards until the camp was assaulted and liberated on 30 JAN, 1945.  Assault personnel were from Company C and F, 6th Ranger Battalion, Alamo scouts and Filipino guerillas.</p>
<p>My replica radio will operate with B+ as low as 24 volts but I usually run it  at 63 VDC provided by seven, 9 V batteries.  They simulate my 67.5 V  dry cell that has failed long ago. The POW camp captives made batteries from bits of copper and zinc uniform buttons and battery acid captured from enemy vehicle batteries.  Reference (12).</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a look at the innards.  The bamboo coil form is evident,the winding job is embarrassing.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="Canteen Radio circuitry" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/Canteen-Radio-Prototype-003.jpg" alt="" width="399" height="299" /></p>
<p>The Signal Corps of WWII had many men who were &#8220;Ham&#8221; radio operators before the war and the design of this type of radio would have been memorized long before &#8211; it was a basic, common design. No instructions needed by skilled personnel.  The radio was built by Capt. Russell J. Hutchinson, US Army Engineer Corps and subsequently passed to William D Gibson, a Ham radio operator and Signal Corps Lieutenant.</p>
<p>This replica is made from primarily WWII vintage electronic parts and includes 2 tuning coils wound on 1 inch diameter bamboo forms.  One is for SW broadcasts, the other for broadcast band use; the turns are held in place with pine pitch.  The four D cell filament batteries are appropriately concealed inside a piece of bamboo tube.  (Mine uses a 6SK7 because I couldn&#8217;t fit 8 D Cells inside the bamboo tube to power the 12 volt filaments of a 12SK7.)  It is my first attempt at building a one-tube regenerative receiver and it works pretty well on AM and CW.  SSB reception (these days) is dependent upon careful adjustment and your imagination &#8211; SSB stability isn&#8217;t great but theirs brought in the AM news from BBC, Radio Australia and US west coast stations including KGEI in San Francisco.  Much more fun to play with than a &#8220;software defined radio&#8221;.  Theirs was a courage and ingenuity &#8211; defined radio.</p>
<p><img class="alignleft" title="Canteen Radio" src="http://www.n6cc.com/wp-content/uploads/canteen-radio-metal-0021.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="480" /></p>
<p>So, does it really work?  Yes, surprisingly well on AM shortwave.  Like all Regens, careful adjustment of the Regeneration control is important and all the controls interact with each other to a certain extent.  The Regen control varies the screen voltage and therefore the gain.  The tuned circuit is isolated from the antenna by a series variable &#8220;antenna&#8221; capacitor which reduced the detuning effect of the antenna on the tuned circuit.  If the wind is blowing the antenna around, the circuit detunes a bit and you have to compensate, but that is a minor problem.  Selectivity is good, &#8220;tuning rate&#8221; via the screwdriver-trimmer is very fast but the Chicken Head fine tuning knob makes that acceptable.  Moving the feedback tap on the tuning coil makes it &#8221; a completely different radio&#8221;, something that can only be appreciated while experimenting with the construction and testing.</p>
<p>I can clearly hear WWV on 5 and 10 MC and occasionally CHU in Ottawa on 7850 KC.  The big international SW stations come in pretty well.  Considering the primitive nature of this radio, it does the job of providing outside contact as your imagination drifts back to the Philippines in WWII.  The challenge was to see what kind of performance could be squeezed from some junk-box parts.  Very satisfying project and a big hit with the public at displays and demonstrations.</p>
<p>There is speculation that the radio was actually originally built on Corregidor before its capture (Bataan death march to Cabanatuan) but was later modified in the camp for a 6J7 tube after the original 12SK7 tube burned out.  Considering the parts requirements, this scenario rings true to me. It hung on the bunk of its custodian, in its canteen cup within the canvas cover &#8211; hidden in plain sight.  The headphone(s) would have been hidden elsewhere.  Its discovery would certainly have resulted in the summary murder of that American soldier, at a minimum.</p>
<p>Reference (11) notes that there was a second shortwave radio at Cabanatuan, built by prisoners with parts stolen from the enemy radio repair shop where some US personnel worked.  They would capture the necessary parts from enemy radio equipment they were supposed to be repairing, telling their captors that parts had failed and replacement parts were needed.  This radio was powered by the camp electrical lighting system which the prisoners had occasional access to. Brave, resourceful  people.</p>
<p>As a telling fact, the United States GAVE radios to POW&#8217;s, at least to the Germans interred in the US.  We were not afraid of them finding out what was going on.<em> The Escape Factory, Reference (6).</em></p>
<p>Also, see Ray (VK2GRP)&#8217;s excellent website for a representative schematic and his fine reproduction radio as well (his pre-dates mine).  Well done Ray !  www.tuberadio.com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.n6cc.com/canteen-radio-receiver/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

